Taylor et al v. Kazmar et al
Filing
14
ORDER re ECF Nos. 11 , 13 Mail Returned : Plaintiff Robert Markley must file his updated address with the Court by 10/20/2016. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/19/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
***
10
11
DANIELLE TAYLOR,
ROBERT MARKLEY,
ORDER
12
Plaintiffs,
v.
13
14
Case No. 3:16-cv-00109-MMD-WGC
NICOLE KAZMAR, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
17
I.
DISCUSSION
18
Based on this Court’s records, it appears that Plaintiff Robert Markley is no
19
longer at the address listed with the Court. The postal service has returned this Court’s
20
last two mailings to Plaintiff as undeliverable (See ECF Nos. 11, 13). The Court notes
21
that pursuant to LR IA 3-1, “a pro se party must immediately file with the court written
22
notification of any change of mailing address . . . The notification must include proof of
23
service on each opposing party or the party’s attorney. Failure to comply with this rule
24
may result in dismissal of the action with prejudice.” LR IA 3-1. This Court grants
25
Plaintiff thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order to file his updated address
26
with this Court. If Plaintiff does not update the Court with his current address within thirty
27
(30) days from the date of entry of this order, the Court will dismiss this action without
28
prejudice.
1
2
3
4
5
6
II.
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, it is ordered that Plaintiff Robert Markley must file his
updated address with the Court within thirty (30) days from the date of this order.
It is further ordered that, if Plaintiff fails to timely comply with this order, the Court
will dismiss this case without prejudice.
DATED THIS 19th day of September 2016.
7
8
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?