Harter v. McDaniel et al

Filing 8

ORDER - The Court grants Plaintiff an extension to file an amended complaint. First Amended Complaint due by 9/15/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 9/1/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 HAROLD E. HARTER, Case No. 3:16-cv-00118-RCJ-WGC Plaintiff, 11 12 v. Order 13 E.K. McDANIEL, et al., Defendants. 14 15 16 17 18 I. DISCUSSION 19 On July 18, 2016, the Court issued an order screening Plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 20 3). The screening order dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice and granted Plaintiff 21 thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 3 at 6:26-7:13). Plaintiff subsequently filed 22 a motion to stay the screening order (ECF No. 5) that the Court construed as a motion for 23 reconsideration. On August 30, 2016, the Court issued an order denying Plaintiff’s motion to 24 stay the original screening order (ECF No. 7). In light of the Court’s denial of Plaintiff’s motion 25 for stay, the Court now grants Plaintiff an extension to file his amended complaint, if any. 26 Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies of the 27 complaint. If Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint he is advised that an amended 28 Page 1 of 3 1 complaint supersedes the original complaint and, thus, the amended complaint must be 2 complete in itself. See Hal Roach Studios, Inc. v. Richard Feiner & Co., Inc., 896 F.2d 1542, 3 1546 (9th Cir. 1989) (holding that “[t]he fact that a party was named in the original complaint 4 is irrelevant; an amended pleading supersedes the original”); see also Lacey v. Maricopa 5 Cnty., 693 F.3d 896, 928 (9th Cir. 2012) (holding that for claims dismissed with prejudice, a 6 plaintiff is not required to reallege such claims in a subsequent amended complaint to preserve 7 them for appeal). Plaintiff’s amended complaint must contain all claims, defendants, and 8 factual allegations that Plaintiff wishes to pursue in this lawsuit. Moreover, Plaintiff must file 9 the amended complaint on this Court’s approved prisoner civil rights form and it must be 10 entitled “First Amended Complaint.” 11 The Court notes that if Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint curing the 12 deficiencies of the complaint, as outlined in the original screening order (ECF No. 3) and the 13 Court’s order denying Plaintiff’s motion to stay (ECF No. 7), Plaintiff shall file the amended 14 complaint within fourteen (14) days from the date of entry of this order. If Plaintiff chooses not 15 to file an amended complaint curing the stated deficiencies, this action shall be dismissed 16 without prejudice. 17 II. CONCLUSION 18 For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that in light of the Court’s order denying 19 Plaintiff’s motion to stay the original screening order (ECF No. 7), the Court grants Plaintiff an 20 extension to file an amended complaint. 21 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint curing 22 the deficiencies of his complaint, as outlined in the original screening order (ECF No. 3) and 23 the Court’s order denying Plaintiff’s motion to stay (ECF No. 7), Plaintiff shall file the amended 24 complaint within fourteen (14) days from the date of entry of this order. 25 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint, he 26 must use the approved form sent to him with the Court’s original screening order and he shall 27 write the words “First Amended” above the words “Civil Rights Complaint” in the caption. 28 Page 2 of 3 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff chooses not to file an amended complaint 2 curing the stated deficiencies of the complaint, this action shall be dismissed without prejudice. 3 DATED: September 1, 2016. 4 5 _________________________________ United States Magistrate Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?