Espinosa v. Stogner et al
Filing
41
ORDER that the Court ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS ECF 40 Report and Recommendation; Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment ECF No. 29 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 11/29/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
BENJAMIN W. ESPINOSA, AMERICAN
HUMANIST ASSOCIATION,
10
Case No.: 3:16-CV-00141-RCJ-WGC
Plaintiffs,
ORDER ADOPTING AND ACCEPTING
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF
NO. 40)
11
12
13
vs.
JOSEPH STOGNER, et al.,
Defendant
14
15
The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
16
(ECF No. 40) entered on October 17, 2017, in which the Magistrate Judge recommends the
17
18
Court deny Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 29). The Court has
19
considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record and
20
has made a review and determination in accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636
21
and applicable case law, and good cause appearing, the court hereby,
22
ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States
23
24
Magistrate Judge (ECF No.40).
25
///
26
///
27
28
///
1
1
2
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No.
29) is DENIED.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this 29th day of November, 2017.
4
5
6
______________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?