Espinosa v. Stogner et al

Filing 41

ORDER that the Court ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS ECF 40 Report and Recommendation; Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment ECF No. 29 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 11/29/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 BENJAMIN W. ESPINOSA, AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION, 10 Case No.: 3:16-CV-00141-RCJ-WGC Plaintiffs, ORDER ADOPTING AND ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 40) 11 12 13 vs. JOSEPH STOGNER, et al., Defendant 14 15 The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate 16 (ECF No. 40) entered on October 17, 2017, in which the Magistrate Judge recommends the 17 18 Court deny Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 29). The Court has 19 considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record and 20 has made a review and determination in accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636 21 and applicable case law, and good cause appearing, the court hereby, 22 ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States 23 24 Magistrate Judge (ECF No.40). 25 /// 26 /// 27 28 /// 1 1 2 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 29) is DENIED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this 29th day of November, 2017. 4 5 6 ______________________________________ ROBERT C. JONES 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?