Merry v. Sandoval et al

Filing 67

ORDER granting ECF No. 62 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney : Attorney Dan M. Winder withdrawn from the case for Plaintiff. All further documents shall be served on Plaintiff at LCC as specified herein. Plaintiff's response to ECF No. 58 Motion for summary judgment due by Monday, 2/18/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 12/18/2018. (Copy of instant order mailed to P at LCC on 12/18/2018.)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA DANIEL V. MERRY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) KAREN A. GEDNEY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ________________________________________) 3:16-cv-00164-MMD-WGC MINUTES OF THE COURT December 18, 2018 PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: KATIE LYNN OGDEN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS: Before the court is the motion of the Law Office of Dan M. Winder, P.C., Dan M. Winder, Esq., Scott C. Dorman, Esq., and Kristina Miletovic, Esq., to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff (ECF No. 62). On November 27, 2018, Defendants filed their non-opposition (ECF No. 65). As of the date of this order, no opposition or response has been filed by Plaintiff. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s counsels’ motion (ECF No. 62) is GRANTED. Henceforth, all documents required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to be served on Plaintiff Daniel Merry shall be sent to the address set forth in the motion: Daniel Vincent Merry Inmate #67889 1200 Prison Rd. Lovelock, Nevada 89410 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 58) shall be filed on or before Monday, February 18, 2019. DEBRA K. KEMPI, CLERK By: /s/ Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?