Simple Pump Co., LLC v. Dugan
Filing
17
MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS before Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. Crtrm Administrator: Katie Lynn Ogden; Pla Counsel: Jessica Woelfel and Laura Jacobsen (Present); Def Counsel: Matthew Berliner (Telephonically) and Dane Anderson (Pre sent); FTR #: FTR; Time of Hearing: 1:33:04 p.m. - 1:49:55 p.m.; Courtroom: 2. Case Managmeent Conference held. The parties' 15 Stipulation to Allow Defendant and Cross-Complainant Peter Dugan Leave to File His Firs t Amended Courterclaim is GRANTED. The Clerk's Office is directed to file "Peter Dugan's First Amended Counterclaim Against Simple Pump Co., LLC," which is attached as Exhibit A to ECF No. 15 . The deadline to file a response to the counterclaim is due no later than Friday, 6/24/2016. A scheduling order is implemented and the following dates are established: Discovery Cut-Off: Friday, 12/30/2016; Dispositive Motion(s): Tuesday, 1/31/2017; Joint Pretrial Order: Tuesday, 2/28/2017. See attached order for additional dates. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
SIMPLE PUMP CO., LLC,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
PETER DUGAN,
)
)
Defendant.
)
___________________________________ )
3:16-cv-00189-HDM-WGC
MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS
May 24, 2016
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEPUTY CLERK:
Katie Lynn Ogden
REPORTER:
FTR
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF: Jessica Woelfel and Laura Jacobsen (Present)
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT: Matthew Berliner (Telephonically) Dane Anderson (Present)
MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS: Case Management Conference
1:33 p.m. Court convenes.
The court first addresses the parties’ “Stipulation to Allow Defendant and CrossComplainant Peter Dugan Leave to File His First Amended Counterclaim” (ECF No. 15). The
stipulation is GRANTED and the clerk’s office is directed to file “Peter Dugan’s First Amended
Counterclaim Against Simple Pump Co., LLC,” which is attached as Exhibit A to ECF No. 15.
The deadline to file a response to the counterclaim is due no later than Friday, 6/24/2016.
The court next addresses the parties’ “Joint 26(F) Report and Modification to Discovery
Schedule” (ECF No. 14). The court makes the observation at page 3 of the joint report that the
term “Cross-Complainant” is used and advises counsel the term counterclaimant is more
commonly used in federal court.
The court next reviews the parties’ special scheduling review (¶ 13, ECF No. 14).
Counsel are advised that, in view of anticipated dispostive motions being filed and the unknown
length of time it will take the court to resolve such motion practice, a trail date will not be
scheduled at this time. However, a scheduling order will be implemented. The court and
counsel confer regarding an appropriate amount of time to complete discovery. The consensus
1
Minutes of Proceedings
3:16-cv-00189-HDM-WGC
May 24, 2016
between the court and counsel is approximately 210 days to complete discovery from today’s
date. The following scheduling order is established:
•
Discovery Cut-Off Date: Friday, 12/30/2016;
•
Amending Pleadings and Adding Parties: Friday, 9/30/2016;
•
Disclosure of Expert(s): Friday, 10/28/2016;
•
Disclosure of Rebuttal Expert(s): Wednesday, 11/23/2016;
•
Dispositive Motion(s): Tuesday, 1/31/2017; and
•
Proposed Joint Pretrial Order: Tuesday, 2/28/2017. In the event
dispositive motions are filed, the date for filing the joint pretrial order shall
be suspended until thirty (30) days after decision of the dispositive
motions or further order of the court.
Should the parties at any time deem it appropriate to schedule a court assisted settlement
conference, counsel may contact Ms. Ogden to inquire about prospective dates before recalled
Magistrate Judge Robert A. McQuaid, Jr., for a settlement conference.
There being no additional matters to address at this time, court adjourns at 1:49 p.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By:
2
/s/
Katie Lynn Ogden, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?