Lindrum v. Colvin

Filing 26

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 22 ) is adopted and accepted, and plaintiff's motion for reversal or remand (ECF No. 9 ) is GRANTED in part and this matter is REMANDED for further development consistent wi th the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 22 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's cross-motion to affirm (ECF No. 19 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in this matter. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 2/15/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8
9
10
11
12

***
Case No. 3:16-cv-00230-LRH-WGC
Plaintiff,
ORDER

SCOTT AARON LINDRUM,
v.

NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.

13
14
15

Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge

16

William G. Cobb (ECF No. 22) entered on January 20, 2017, recommending granting in

17

part plaintiff’s motion for reversal or remand (ECF No. 9) entered on August 7, 2016,

18

and denying defendant’s cross-motion to affirm (ECF No. 19) entered on November 29,

19

2016. On February 3, 2017, defendant filed its Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s

20

Report and Recommendations (ECF No. 23) and on February 7, 2017, plaintiff filed his

21

Response to Defendant’s Objections to the U.S. Magistrate Judge’s Report and

22

Recommendations (ECF No. 24).

23

The action was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

24

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 1B 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District

25

Court for the District of Nevada.

26
27

The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered
defendant’s objections, the response of plaintiff, and the pleadings and memoranda of

28
1

1

the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)

2

and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and

3

Recommendation (ECF No. 22) entered on January 20, 2017, should be adopted and

4

accepted.

5

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and

6

Recommendation (ECF No. 22) entered on January 20, 2017, is adopted and accepted,

7

and plaintiff’s motion for reversal or remand (ECF No. 9) is GRANTED in part and this

8

matter is REMANDED for further development consistent with the Report and

9

Recommendation (ECF No. 22).

10
11
12
13

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant’s cross-motion to affirm (ECF No. 19)
is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in
this matter.

14

IT IS SO ORDERED.

15

DATED this 15th day of February, 2017.

16
17

LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2