McNair v. Baca et al
Filing
47
ORDER that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ECF No. 43 is ADOPTED and ACCEPTED; Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment ECF No. 35 is GRANTED; Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment ECF No. 39 is DENIED AS MOOT; Clerk directed to enter judgment and close this case. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 12/7/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT CCOURT
3
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
4
5
6
CLARENCE McNAIR,
7
8
Plaintiff,
vs.
9
10
ISIDRO BACA, et al.,
Defendants.
11
) Case No.: 3:16-CV-00234-RCJ-VPC
)
) ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
12
13
14
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge (ECF No. 431) entered on October 10, 2017, recommending that the Court grant
15
16
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 35). On November 30, 2017
17
Plaintiff filed Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No.
18
46).
19
The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the
20
21
objections of the Plaintiff, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other
22
relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2.
23
The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF
24
No. 43) entered on October 10, 2017 should be ADOPTED and ACCEPTED.
25
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF
26
27
28
No. 35) is GRANTED.
1
Refers to Court’s docket number.
ORDER - 1
1
2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment
(ECF No. 39) is DENIED AS MOOT.
3
4
5
6
7
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment
accordingly and close the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 7th day of December, 2017.
8
9
10
ROBERT C. JONES
Senior District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?