Kilmer v. Scadatec, Inc. et al
Filing
26
ORDER dismissing with prejudice this case re ECF No. 25 Stipulation. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 12/1/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
5
Matthew D. Francis, SBN: 6978
mfrancis@bhfs.com
Steven A. Caloiaro, SBN: 12344
scaloiaro@bhfs.com
BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP
5371 Kietzke Lane
Reno, NV 89511
Telephone: 775.324.4100
Facsimile: 775.333.8171
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff William B. Kilmer
1
2
3
4
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
5371 Kietzke Lane
Reno, NV 89511
775.324.4100
B ROWNSTEIN H YATT F ARBER S CHRECK , LLP
8
WILLIAM B. KILMER, an individual,
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
14
CASE NO.: 3:16-cv-00238-LRH-WGC
3:16-cv-00238-WGC
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
SCADATEC, INC., a Nevada corporation,
ARORA ENGINEERING, INC., a Nevada
corporation,
15
16
Defendants.
17
18
IT IS STIPULATED and agreed by and between Plaintiff William B. Kilmer (“Plaintiff”)
19
through his counsel of record, and Defendants Scadatec, Inc. and Arora Engineering, Inc.
20
(collectively, “Defendants”), through their counsel of record, that the above-captioned matter be
21
dismissed with prejudice, and that each party bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO STIPULATED this 1st day of December, 2016.
BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER
SCHRECK, LLP
KALICKI COLLIER, LLP
By: /s/ Steven A. Caloiaro
Matthew D. Francis, SBN: 6978
mfrancis@bhfs.com
Steven A. Caloiaro, SBN: 12344
scaloiaro@bhfs.com
5371 Kietzke Lane
Reno, NV 89511
Attorneys for Plaintiff
By: /s/ John A. Collier
John A. Collier, SBN: 4570
jac@kalickicollier.com
401 Ryland Street, Suite 200
Reno, NV 89502
Attorneys for Defendants
1
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
December 1, 2016
______________________________
2
3
4
_______________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
10
11
5371 Kietzke Lane
Reno, NV 89511
775.324.4100
B ROWNSTEIN H YATT F ARBER S CHRECK , LLP
9
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
11
5371 Kietzke Lane
Reno, NV 89511
775.324.4100
B ROWNSTEIN H YATT F ARBER S CHRECK , LLP
9
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Pursuant to FRCP 5(b), I certify that I am an employee of Brownstein Hyatt Farber
Schreck, LLP, and on this 1st day of December, 2016, I served the document entitled
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE on the parties listed
below via the following:
John A. Collier, Esq.
Kalicki Collier, LLP
401 Ryland Street, Suite 200
Reno, NV 89502
Fax: (775) 852-2642
Email: jac@kalickicollier.com
Attorneys for Defendants
VIA FIRST CLASS U.S. MAIL: by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed
envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Reno, Nevada for
delivery to the foregoing.
VIA FACSIMILE: by transmitting to a facsimile machine maintained by the person on
whom it is served at the facsimile machine telephone number as last given by that person on any
document which he/she has filed in the cause and served on the party making the service. The
copy of the document served by the facsimile transmission bears a notation of the date and place
of transmission and the facsimile telephone number to which it was transmitted.
BY PERSONAL SERVICE: by personally hand-delivering or causing to be hand
delivered by such designated individual whose particular duties include delivery of such on behalf
of the firm, addressed to the individual(s) listed, signed by such individual or his/her
representative accepting on his/her behalf.
VIA COURIER: by delivering a copy of the document to a courier service for over-night
delivery to the foregoing parties.
VIA ELECTRONIC SERVICE: by electronically filing the document with the Clerk of
the Court using the ECF system which served the foregoing parties electronically.
21
22
/s/ Nancy R. Lindsley
Employee of Brownstein Hyatt Farber
Schreck, LLP
23
24
25
26
018919\0001\15274847.1
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?