Securities and Exchange Commission v. Kaplan, Esq. et al

Filing 101

ORDER granting ECF No. 97 Stipulation for Entry of Final Judgment Against Relief Defendant Manna Investments, LLC. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/8/2018. (Defendant Manna Investments, LLC terminated.) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 Alyssa A. Qualls (IL Bar No. 6292124) Email: quallsa@sec.gov Amy S. Cotter (IL Bar No. 6238157) Email: cottera@sec.gov Raven A. Winters (IL Bar No. 6291077) Email: wintersr@sec.gov 4 5 6 7 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff Robert J. Burson, Associate Regional Director Amy S. Cotter, Assistant Regional Director Alyssa A. Qualls, Regional Trial Counsel Securities and Exchange Commission 175 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 900 Chicago, Illinois 60604 Telephone: (312) 353-7390 Facsimile: (312) 353-7398 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 Northern Division 12 13 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 14 Case No. 3:16-cv-00270-MMD-VPC Honorable Miranda Du Plaintiff, 15 vs. 16 17 18 19 DAVID B. KAPLAN, ESQ., SYNCHRONIZED ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS, LLC, SYNCHRONIZED ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, LTD., and MANNA INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISES, INC., STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT AGAINST RELIEF DEFENDANT MANNA INVESTMENTS, LLC 20 Defendants, 21 and 22 24 LISA M. KAPLAN, THE WATER-WALKING FOUNDATION, INC., and MANNA INVESTMENTS, LLC, 25 Relief Defendants. 23 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned parties, as follows: 1 1. The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) and 2 Relief Defendant Manna Investments, LLC (“Relief Defendant,” and together with the Commission, 3 the “Parties”) jointly move this Court to enter final judgment against Relief Defendant. The Parties 4 have reached a settlement, and jointly move this Court to enter the proposed final judgment and 5 resolve this matter. 6 7 8 9 10 11 2. The Parties have reached a settlement to resolve all claims against Relief Defendant. The settlement includes: (1) disgorgement; and (2) prejudgment interest. 3. A proposed final judgment as to Relief Defendant is attached as Exhibit A. Among other things, the proposed final judgment orders Relief Defendant to pay disgorgement in the amount of $483,417.52, plus prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $38,119.61. 4. Without either admitting or denying the allegations of the complaint in this action, 12 Relief Defendant has consented to the entry of the proposed final judgment, as reflected in the 13 Consent attached as Exhibit B. 14 15 16 5. The settlement brings the litigation to a close, without the need for a trial, and thus conserves the resources of the Court and the Parties. 6. The Parties agree that entry of the proposed final judgment is in the public interest, 17 and is a fair and reasonable resolution of this matter. See SEC v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., 18 752 F.3d 285 (2d Cir. 2014). 19 20 7. The Parties respectfully request the entry of final judgment at the Court’s earliest convenience. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No. 3:16-CV-00270-MMD-VPC 1 WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, the parties jointly move this Court for entry of 2 final judgment against Relief Defendant. 3 Date: January 8, 2018 4 5 6 7 8 Manna Investments, LLC /s/ Alyssa A. Qualls___ Alyssa A. Qualls (IL Bar No. 6292124) 175 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 1450 Chicago, Illinois 60604 Telephone: (312) 353-7390 Facsimile: (312) 353-7398 Email: quallsa@sec.gov By: /s/ David B. Kaplan David B. Kaplan, Esq. Managing Member 1314-B Cave Rock Drive Glenbrook, NV 89413 Telephone: (509) 263-4625 9 10 Counsel for Plaintiff United States Securities and Exchange Commission 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED: 13 ________________________________ The Honorable Miranda Du United States District Judge 14 January 8, 2018 Dated: _______________________ 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case No. 3:16-CV-00270-MMD-VPC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?