Williams v. Reno Police Department et al

Filing 10

ORDER ADOPTING AND ACCEPTING Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 9 ). IFP Applications (ECF Nos. 1 , 7 0 are GRANTED. Clerk shall file the Complaint (ECF No. 1 -1). The Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND as to Coun ts I and II against all defendants. The Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE WITH LEAVE TO AMEND as to Count III against Tallman, Utter, and the Reno Police Department. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 4/12/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 * ** ) ) CASE NO.: 3:16-CV-00281-RCJ-VPC Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER ) RENO POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate THOMAS L. WILLIAMS, 10 (ECF No. 9) entered on March 15, 2017, in which the Magistrate Judge recommends the Court dismiss 11 this action in part with leave to amend in part. The Court has considered the pleadings and memoranda 12 of the parties and other relevant matters of record and has made a review and determination in 13 accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable case law, and good cause 14 appearing, the court hereby 15 ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States 16 Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 9). 17 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s IFP (ECF No. 1, 7) are GRANTED, the Court 18 of the Clerk shall file the Complaint (ECF No. 1-1). 19 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, 20 WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND as to Counts I and II against all defendants. 21 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE 22 WITH LEAVE TO AMEND as to Count III against Tallman, Utter, and the Reno Police Department. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of April, 2017. 24 25 26 _______________________________ ROBERT C. JONES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?