Fields v. Baker et al

Filing 5

ORDER directing Clerk to add NV AG as counsel for Respondents and to file and e-serve them with ECF No. 1 -1 Petition (NEF sent 11/14/2016); directing Clerk to file the ECF No. 1 -2 Motion for Appointment of Counsel; granting the Motion for Appointment of Counsel and appointing FPD to represent Petitioner; directing Clerk to e-serve FPD with this order and the petition (NEFs sent 11/14/2016); giving FPD 30 days to file notice of appearance or indicate its inability to do so. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/14/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; copy also mailed to Petitioner - KR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 *** 9 JOHN VERNON FIELDS, 10 Case No. 3:16-cv-00298-MMD-VPC Petitioner, ORDER v. 11 RENEE BAKER, et al., 12 Respondents. 13 14 Petitioner John Vernon Fields has submitted a pro se petition for writ of habeas 15 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He has now paid the filing fee (see ECF No. 4). 16 The Court has reviewed the petition pursuant to Habeas Rule 4, and it will be docketed 17 and served on respondents. 18 A petition for federal habeas corpus should include all claims for relief of which 19 petitioner is aware. If petitioner fails to include such a claim in his petition, he may be 20 forever barred from seeking federal habeas relief upon that claim. See 28 U.S.C. 21 §2254(b) (successive petitions). If petitioner is aware of any claim not included in his 22 petition, he should notify the court of that as soon as possible, perhaps by means of a 23 motion to amend his petition to add the claim. 24 Petitioner has also submitted a motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 1-2). 25 There is no constitutional right to appointed counsel for a federal habeas corpus 26 proceeding. Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 555 (1987); Bonin v. Vasquez, 999 27 F.2d 425, 428 (9th Cir.1993). The decision to appoint counsel is generally discretionary. 28 Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1023 1 (1987); Bashor v. Risley, 730 F.2d 1228, 1234 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 838 2 (1984). However, counsel must be appointed if the complexities of the case are such 3 that denial of counsel would amount to a denial of due process, and where the petitioner 4 is a person of such limited education as to be incapable of fairly presenting his claims. 5 See Chaney, 801 F.2d at 1196; see also Hawkins v. Bennett, 423 F.2d 948 (8th 6 Cir.1970). Here, Fields’s petition may contain relatively complex legal issues, and he is 7 serving a life sentence without the possibility of parole. Thus, the Court concludes that 8 the appointment of counsel is justified to ensure due process. See Chaney, 801 F.2d at 9 1196; see also Hawkins v. Bennett, 423 F.2d 948 (8th Cir. 1970). Accordingly, the 10 motion will be granted. It is therefore ordered that the Clerk file and electronically serve the petition (ECF 11 12 No. 1-1) on the respondents. It is further ordered that the Clerk add Adam Paul Laxalt, Nevada Attorney 13 14 General, as counsel for respondents. It is further ordered that the Clerk file petitioner’s motion for appointment of 15 16 counsel (ECF No. 1-2). It is further ordered that the motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 1-2) is 17 18 granted. It is further ordered that the Federal Public Defender (“FPD”) is appointed to 19 20 represent petitioner. 21 It is further ordered that the Clerk electronically serve on the FPD a copy of this 22 order, together with a copy of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1-1). The 23 FPD shall have thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order to file a notice of 24 appearance or to indicate to the Court its inability to represent petitioner in these 25 proceedings. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 2 1 It is further ordered that, after counsel has appeared for petitioner in this case, 2 the Court will issue a scheduling order, which will, among other things, set a deadline 3 for the filing of a first amended petition, if any. 4 5 DATED THIS 14th day of November 2016. 6 MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?