Hoffmann v. Rail City Casino

Filing 11

ORDER adopting and accepting ECF No. 10 R&R; denying as moot Plaintiff's ECF No. 9 IFP application; directing that this action remains dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 1/4/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 REV KASEY F. HOFFMANN, 5 Plaintiff, 6 7 vs. 8 RAIL CITY, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 ) Case No.: 3:16-CV-00304-RCJ-WGC ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 11 12 The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation of United States 13 Magistrate (ECF #10) entered on December 8, 2016, in which the Magistrate Judge 14 recommends the Court deny as moot Plaintiff’s Renewed Application to Proceed In 15 Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 9) and Plaintiff’s action remain dismissed with prejudice. The 16 17 Court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant 18 matters of record and has made a review and determination in accordance with the 19 requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable case law, and good cause appearing, 20 the court hereby 21 22 23 24 25 ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (ECF #10). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Renewed Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 9) is DENIED as MOOT. 26 27 28 ORDER - 1 1 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action remains DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of January, 2017. 5 6 7 _____________________________ ROBERT C. JONES SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?