Eubanks v. Baker et al

Filing 64

ORDER - It is therefore ordered that the motions (ECF Nos. 57 , 60 , 63 ) are 0granted. It is further ordered that Respondents reply in support of their motion to dismiss (ECF No. 58 ) is due on or before October 21, 2022. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/13/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CJS)

Case 3:16-cv-00336-MMD-CSD Document 64 Filed 09/13/22 Page 1 of 1

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

5

***

6
7
8
9
10

CHARLES EUBANKS,
v.

Case No. 3:16-cv-00336-MMD-WGC
Petitioner,

ORDER

RENEE BAKER, et al.,
Respondents.

11
12

Pending in this habeas corpus action are three motions for extensions of time –

13

one filed by Respondents in relation to their now-filed motion to dismiss (ECF No. 57),

14

one filed by Petitioner Charles Eubanks in relation to his now-filed response thereto (ECF

15

No. 60), and another filed by Respondents asking for additional time to file a reply (ECF

16

No. 63). The Court is satisfied that all three motions were filed in good faith and not for

17

the purpose of delay. In addition, none were opposed by the other party.

18

It is therefore ordered that the motions (ECF Nos. 57, 60, 63) are granted.

19

It is further ordered that Respondents’ reply in support of their motion to dismiss

20
21

(ECF No. 58) is due on or before October 21, 2022.
DATED THIS 13th Day of September 2022.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

MIRANDA M. DU
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE