Eubanks v. Baker et al

Filing 71

ORDER - It is therefore ordered that Respondents' motion to extend time to file their answer (ECF No. 70 ) is granted. The answer is due June 2, 2023 (6/2/2023). No further extensions will be granted absent a showing of extraordi nary circumstances. It is further ordered that Respondents' prior motions for extension of time (ECF Nos. 68 , 69 ) are denied as moot. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/18/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CJS)

Case 3:16-cv-00336-MMD-CSD Document 71 Filed 04/18/23 Page 1 of 1

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

5

***

6
7
8
9
10

CHARLES EUBANKS,

Case No. 3:16-cv-00336-MMD-CSD
Petitioner,

v.

ORDER

RENEE BAKER, et al.,
Respondents.

11
12

Respondents, through counsel, move to extend time to file their answer to the

13

remaining grounds for relief in the Petitioner’s third amended petition. (ECF No. 70.)

14

Because the motion appears to be filed in good faith and not solely for the purpose of

15

delay, it will be granted. The Court notes, however, that the extension will set a deadline

16

for the answer that is more than seven months from the date the Court issued a decision

17

on Respondents’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 67). Thus, the Court is not inclined to grant

18

further extensions beyond this one.

19

It is therefore ordered that Respondents’ motion to extend time to file their answer

20

(ECF No. 70) is granted. The answer is due June 2, 2023. No further extensions will be

21

granted absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances.

22
23
24

It is further ordered that Respondents’ prior motions for extension of time (ECF
Nos. 68, 69) are denied as moot.
DATED THIS 18th Day of April 2023.

25
26
27
28

MIRANDA M. DU
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE