Eubanks v. Baker et al

Filing 76

ORDER - It is therefore ordered that Petitioner's motion to extend time (ECF No. 75 ) is granted. Petitioner's reply to the Respondents' answer (ECF No. 72 ) is due September 15, 2023. It is further ordered that Petitioner's prior motion for extension of time (ECF No. 74 ) is granted nunc pro tunc as of August 1, 2023. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/5/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)

Case 3:16-cv-00336-MMD-CSD Document 76 Filed 09/05/23 Page 1 of 1

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

5

***

6
7
8
9

CHARLES EUBANKS,
v.

Case No. 3:16-cv-00336-MMD-CSD
Petitioner,

ORDER

RENEE BAKER, et al.,
Respondents.

10
11

Petitioner Charles Eubanks, through counsel, moves to extend time to file his reply

12

to the Respondents’ answer (ECF No. 72). (ECF No. 75.) The motion appears to be filed

13

in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay. In addition, counsel for Petitioner

14

represents to the Court that opposing counsel does not oppose the extension.

15

It is therefore ordered that Petitioner’s motion to extend time (ECF No. 75) is

16

granted. Petitioner’s reply to the Respondents’ answer (ECF No. 72) is due September

17

15, 2023.

18
19
20

It is further ordered that Petitioner’s prior motion for extension of time (ECF No.
74) is granted nunc pro tunc as of August 1, 2023.
DATED THIS 5th Day of September 2023.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

MIRANDA M. DU
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE