Follett v. LeGrand et al
Filing
22
ORDER granting ECF No. 21 Motion to Extend Time re ECF No. 1 Petition: Respondents' answers due by 7/11/2017. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 6/13/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
LOREN RAYMOND FOLLETT
10
Petitioner,
11
vs.
12
ROBERT LeGRAND, et al.,
13
3:16-cv-00370-HDM-WGC
Respondents.
ORDER
14
______________________________/
15
16
In this habeas corpus action, the respondents were due to file their answer by June 12, 2017.
17
See Order entered March 27, 2017 (ECF No. 19); Notice of Abandonment of Claim filed April 12,
18
2017 (ECF No. 20).
19
On June 8, 2017, respondents filed a motion for extension of time (ECF No. 21), requesting a
20
29-day extension of time, to July 11, 2017. Petitioner does not oppose the motion for extension of
21
time. Respondents’ counsel states that the extension of time is necessary for personal reasons -- his
22
family’s relocation. The court finds that respondents’ motion for extension of time is made in good
23
faith and not solely for the purpose of delay, and that there is good cause for the extension of time
24
requested.
25
26
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents’ Motion for Enlargement of Time (ECF
No. 21) is GRANTED. Respondents will have until July 11, 2017, to file their answer.
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in all other respects, the schedule for further
2
proceedings set forth in the order entered July 6, 2016 (ECF No. 2) shall remain in effect.
3
Dated this 13th day of June, 2017.
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?