Antonetti v. McDaniels et al
Filing
77
ORDER that the claims against Harold Mike Byrne are dismissed without prejudice. See order for specifics. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/3/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - WJ)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
JOSEPH ANTONETTI,
8
9
10
11
Case No. 3:16-cv-00396-MMD-WGC
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
E.K. MCDANIELS, et al.,
Defendants.
12
The Complaint in this action was filed on April 6, 2017. (ECF No. 4.) The Court
13
issued a notice of intent to dismiss Michael Fletcher, Hampton, and Harold Mike Byrne
14
under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) unless proof of service was filed by May 24, 2019. (ECF No.
15
49.) To date, no such proof of service has been filed. The Court dismissed the claims
16
against Michael Fletcher and Hampton in a prior order and noted that Harold Mike
17
Byrne would be dismissed if the Office of the Attorney General were unable to find an
18
alternative physical address for him. (ECF No. 70 at 1.) The Office of the Attorney
19
General has not advised the Court whether it is able to find an alternative physical
20
address for Harold Mike Byrne. (See ECF No. 69 at 1 (“The Office of the Attorney
21
General shall advise the court within fifteen (15) days whether it is able to find an
22
alternative physical address for Defendant Harold Mike Byrne.”).) The Court thus
23
assumes that the Office of the Attorney General has not found an alternative physical
24
address for Harold Mike Byrne. Accordingly, it is ordered that the claims against Harold
25
Mike Byrne are dismissed without prejudice.
26
DATED THIS 3rd day of July 2019.
27
28
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?