Pine View Estates Homeowners Association v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Filing 25

ORDER granting ECF No. 24 Stipulation : All proceedings in this lawsuit are stayed until November 12, 2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/13/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 FRANCIS C. FLAHERTY Nevada Bar No. 5303 CASEY A. GILLHAM Nevada Bar No. 11971 DYER LAWRENCE, LLP 2805 Mountain Street Carson City, Nevada 89703 (775) 885-1896 telephone (775) 885-8728 fax fflaherty@dyerlawrence.com cgillham@dyerlawrence.com Attorneys for Petitioner Pine View Estates Homeowners’ Association 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 16 ) ) Case No. 3:16-CV-00402-MMD-WGC ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) STIPULATION TO STAY MATTER ) UNTIL NOVEMBER 12, 2018 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL ) (SIXTH REQUEST) PROTECTION AGENCY, ) ) Respondents. ) __________________________________________) 17 TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT: 18 Petitioner, Pine View Estates Home Owners Association ("PVHOA"), and Respondent, United 19 States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA"), have agreed and hereby stipulate pursuant to 20 Local Rules IA 6-1 and 6-2 as follows: 11 12 13 14 15 PINE VIEW ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, 21 22 A. This matter involves PVHOA's appeal of a June 2, 2016 compliance order issued by EPA ("Compliance Order"). The stay is necessary because the appeal is approaching a resolution. 23 B. On May 14, 2018, because the appeal was approaching a resolution, the Parties 2805 Mountain Street Carson City, Nevada 89703 (775) 885-1896 Dyer Lawrence, LLP 24 requested a fifth, 90-day stay of this matter until August 14, 2018, and the Court ordered that stay 25 on May 14, 2018 (ECF Nos. 21, 22). There has been substantial progress towards this resolution, but 26 as discussed below, the final resolution of this matter cannot be accomplished until the final 27 resolution of separate litigation involving the PVHOA, but not the EPA. 28 /// C. 1 As alluded to immediately above, the resolution of this petition is based on the 2 settlement of a related matter. On September 12, 2017, PVHOA and Mark Kizer, another party 3 subject to the Compliance Order, entered into a settlement agreement ("Settlement Agreement") in 4 Kizer v. PTP, Inc. et al, Case No. 3:15-CV-00120-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev.) (ECF No. 338). There are 5 over 200 defendants in the Kizer case, including all of the individual homeowners in Pine View 6 Estates, PVHOA and the Bureau of Indian Affairs (“BIA”). The Settlement Agreement was 7 contingent on the BIA’s approval of the transfer of land comprising the HOA common areas to the 8 HOA in fee simple, a trust-to-fee transfer.1 The fee lands will serve as collateral for a loan to fund 9 the remediation obligations detailed in the Compliance Order. The BIA approved said trust-to-fee 10 transfer on October 18, 2017 and that transfer was contemplated to occur by the end of November, 11 2017. D. 12 Once the land is actually transferred from trust to fee, as described in Para. C, the 13 Parties in this case anticipate lodging a consent decree relating to and addressing the Compliance 14 Order. The consent decree will need to be negotiated and once finalized and approved by officials 15 at EPA and the United States Department of Justice, will be lodged with the Court. The Parties will 16 then request that the Court approve and enter the consent decree. E. 17 On November 8, 2017, the Hon. Robert C. Jones confirmed and approved 18 the Settlement Agreement described in Para. C. 19 3:15-CV-00120-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev.) (ECF No. 452). F. 20 See Kizer v. PTP, Inc., Case No. However, subsequent to Judge Jones’ approval of the Settlement Agreement in the Settlement Agreement; specifically, attorneys representing the title insurers who are funding the 23 Settlement Agreement, as well as attorneys representing individual homeowners, asserted that the 24 2805 Mountain Street Carson City, Nevada 89703 (775) 885-1896 Kizer case, a dispute arose between Kizer and some of the defendants in the implementation of the 22 Dyer Lawrence, LLP 21 BIA had not fully complied with the terms of the Settlement Agreement, and by extension, the 25 requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act (“NHPA”) in effecting the transfer of land 26 described in Para. C. Subsequently, there were extensive discussions among attorneys representing 27 28 1 The BIA holds title to the land comprising Pine View Estates in trust on behalf of Kizer. -2- 1 Kizer, the title insurance companies and individual homeowners to resolve the issue of whether or 2 not there has been compliance with NHPA or the terms of the Settlement Agreement in the Kizer 3 case. G. 4 On April 18, 2018 counsel for Kizer sent a letter to counsel for the title insurance 5 companies and counsel for defendants in the Kizer case documenting the points of dispute regarding 6 implementation of the settlement agreement, setting forth Kizer’s position on those points and 7 proposing final steps to resolve all points of dispute, including actions to be undertaken by BIA at 8 Kizer’s request to comply with NHPA. In closing his letter, counsel for Kizer asked title insurance 9 company counsel and all defense counsel to notify him immediately of any other points of dispute 10 or any objection to the proposed course of action set forth in his letter. As of the submission of this 11 stipulation, counsel for PVHOA is not aware of any other dispute points or objection to Kizer’s 12 proposed course of action as set forth in the April 18th letter being raised by counsel for the title 13 insurance companies or any defense counsel and anticipates full implementation of the settlement 14 agreement approved by Judge Jones once the BIA completes all necessary steps to effectuate the 15 trust-to-fee transfer detailed in Para. C supra. H. 16 On July 24, 2018 the BIA sent a letter to Nevada’s State Historic Preservation Office 17 (“SHPO’) regarding BIA compliance with NHPA. SHPO may take up to thirty days to respond to 18 BIA. Assuming SHPO raises no NHPA concerns within that thirty-day period, BIA will notify the 19 Washoe Tribe that it has approved the trust-to-fee transfer. Thereafter, the Washoe Tribe has thirty 20 days to lodge an objection to the transfer. Assuming no objection from the Washoe Tribe, which did 21 not object following the BIA’s October 18, 2017 approval (Para. C supra), BIA will thereafter 22 transfer fee title for the common areas to the HOA in October or November of this year. This 23 transfer will trigger the consent decree process described in Para. D. supra. I. 2805 Mountain Street Carson City, Nevada 89703 (775) 885-1896 Dyer Lawrence, LLP 24 25 The approval and entry of the anticipated consent decree described in Para. D would fully resolve PVHOA’s appeal of the Compliance Order in this case. J. 26 To promote and facilitate these efforts, allow the parties to fully focus thereon, and 27 avoid unnecessary litigation and discovery activity and expense during the necessary settlement and 28 /// -3- 1 consent decree negotiations, the parties jointly request that this Court issue an Order staying these 2 proceedings until November 12, 2018. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, with the 4 approval of the Court, as follows: All proceedings in this lawsuit are hereby stayed until November 5 12, 2018. 6 7 Dated: August 13, 2018. JEFFREY H. WOOD Acting Assistant Attorney General 8 By: /s/ Michael C. Martinez Michael C. Martinez (CA Bar No. 275581) Michael.C.Martinez@usdoj.gov Environmental Defense Section 601 D Street N.W., Suite 8000 Washington D.C. 20004 Tel. (202) 514-0135 9 10 11 12 13 Attorney for Respondent 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Dated: August 13, 2018. DYER LAWRENCE, LLP By: /s/ Francis C. Flaherty Francis C. Flaherty FFlaherty@dyerlawrence.com 2805 Mountain Street Carson City, Nevada 89703 (775) 885-1896 FAX: (775) 885-8728 Attorney for Petitioner. 21 22 2805 Mountain Street Carson City, Nevada 89703 (775) 885-1896 IT IS SO ORDERED: 24 Dyer Lawrence, LLP 23 ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 25 August 13, DATED: ______________, 2018 26 27 28 -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?