Pine View Estates Homeowners Association v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Filing
25
ORDER granting ECF No. 24 Stipulation : All proceedings in this lawsuit are stayed until November 12, 2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/13/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
FRANCIS C. FLAHERTY
Nevada Bar No. 5303
CASEY A. GILLHAM
Nevada Bar No. 11971
DYER LAWRENCE, LLP
2805 Mountain Street
Carson City, Nevada 89703
(775) 885-1896 telephone
(775) 885-8728 fax
fflaherty@dyerlawrence.com
cgillham@dyerlawrence.com
Attorneys for Petitioner Pine View Estates Homeowners’ Association
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
16
)
) Case No. 3:16-CV-00402-MMD-WGC
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
v.
)
STIPULATION TO STAY MATTER
)
UNTIL NOVEMBER 12, 2018
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL
)
(SIXTH REQUEST)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
)
Respondents.
)
__________________________________________)
17
TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT:
18
Petitioner, Pine View Estates Home Owners Association ("PVHOA"), and Respondent, United
19
States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA"), have agreed and hereby stipulate pursuant to
20
Local Rules IA 6-1 and 6-2 as follows:
11
12
13
14
15
PINE VIEW ESTATES HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION,
21
22
A.
This matter involves PVHOA's appeal of a June 2, 2016 compliance order issued by
EPA ("Compliance Order"). The stay is necessary because the appeal is approaching a resolution.
23
B.
On May 14, 2018, because the appeal was approaching a resolution, the Parties
2805 Mountain Street
Carson City, Nevada 89703
(775) 885-1896
Dyer Lawrence, LLP
24
requested a fifth, 90-day stay of this matter until August 14, 2018, and the Court ordered that stay
25
on May 14, 2018 (ECF Nos. 21, 22). There has been substantial progress towards this resolution, but
26
as discussed below, the final resolution of this matter cannot be accomplished until the final
27
resolution of separate litigation involving the PVHOA, but not the EPA.
28
///
C.
1
As alluded to immediately above, the resolution of this petition is based on the
2
settlement of a related matter. On September 12, 2017, PVHOA and Mark Kizer, another party
3
subject to the Compliance Order, entered into a settlement agreement ("Settlement Agreement") in
4
Kizer v. PTP, Inc. et al, Case No. 3:15-CV-00120-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev.) (ECF No. 338). There are
5
over 200 defendants in the Kizer case, including all of the individual homeowners in Pine View
6
Estates, PVHOA and the Bureau of Indian Affairs (“BIA”). The Settlement Agreement was
7
contingent on the BIA’s approval of the transfer of land comprising the HOA common areas to the
8
HOA in fee simple, a trust-to-fee transfer.1 The fee lands will serve as collateral for a loan to fund
9
the remediation obligations detailed in the Compliance Order. The BIA approved said trust-to-fee
10
transfer on October 18, 2017 and that transfer was contemplated to occur by the end of November,
11
2017.
D.
12
Once the land is actually transferred from trust to fee, as described in Para. C, the
13
Parties in this case anticipate lodging a consent decree relating to and addressing the Compliance
14
Order. The consent decree will need to be negotiated and once finalized and approved by officials
15
at EPA and the United States Department of Justice, will be lodged with the Court. The Parties will
16
then request that the Court approve and enter the consent decree.
E.
17
On November 8, 2017, the Hon. Robert C. Jones confirmed and approved
18
the Settlement Agreement described in Para. C.
19
3:15-CV-00120-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev.) (ECF No. 452).
F.
20
See Kizer v. PTP, Inc., Case No.
However, subsequent to Judge Jones’ approval of the Settlement Agreement in the
Settlement Agreement; specifically, attorneys representing the title insurers who are funding the
23
Settlement Agreement, as well as attorneys representing individual homeowners, asserted that the
24
2805 Mountain Street
Carson City, Nevada 89703
(775) 885-1896
Kizer case, a dispute arose between Kizer and some of the defendants in the implementation of the
22
Dyer Lawrence, LLP
21
BIA had not fully complied with the terms of the Settlement Agreement, and by extension, the
25
requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act (“NHPA”) in effecting the transfer of land
26
described in Para. C. Subsequently, there were extensive discussions among attorneys representing
27
28
1
The BIA holds title to the land comprising Pine View Estates in trust on behalf of Kizer.
-2-
1
Kizer, the title insurance companies and individual homeowners to resolve the issue of whether or
2
not there has been compliance with NHPA or the terms of the Settlement Agreement in the Kizer
3
case.
G.
4
On April 18, 2018 counsel for Kizer sent a letter to counsel for the title insurance
5
companies and counsel for defendants in the Kizer case documenting the points of dispute regarding
6
implementation of the settlement agreement, setting forth Kizer’s position on those points and
7
proposing final steps to resolve all points of dispute, including actions to be undertaken by BIA at
8
Kizer’s request to comply with NHPA. In closing his letter, counsel for Kizer asked title insurance
9
company counsel and all defense counsel to notify him immediately of any other points of dispute
10
or any objection to the proposed course of action set forth in his letter. As of the submission of this
11
stipulation, counsel for PVHOA is not aware of any other dispute points or objection to Kizer’s
12
proposed course of action as set forth in the April 18th letter being raised by counsel for the title
13
insurance companies or any defense counsel and anticipates full implementation of the settlement
14
agreement approved by Judge Jones once the BIA completes all necessary steps to effectuate the
15
trust-to-fee transfer detailed in Para. C supra.
H.
16
On July 24, 2018 the BIA sent a letter to Nevada’s State Historic Preservation Office
17
(“SHPO’) regarding BIA compliance with NHPA. SHPO may take up to thirty days to respond to
18
BIA. Assuming SHPO raises no NHPA concerns within that thirty-day period, BIA will notify the
19
Washoe Tribe that it has approved the trust-to-fee transfer. Thereafter, the Washoe Tribe has thirty
20
days to lodge an objection to the transfer. Assuming no objection from the Washoe Tribe, which did
21
not object following the BIA’s October 18, 2017 approval (Para. C supra), BIA will thereafter
22
transfer fee title for the common areas to the HOA in October or November of this year. This
23
transfer will trigger the consent decree process described in Para. D. supra.
I.
2805 Mountain Street
Carson City, Nevada 89703
(775) 885-1896
Dyer Lawrence, LLP
24
25
The approval and entry of the anticipated consent decree described in Para. D would
fully resolve PVHOA’s appeal of the Compliance Order in this case.
J.
26
To promote and facilitate these efforts, allow the parties to fully focus thereon, and
27
avoid unnecessary litigation and discovery activity and expense during the necessary settlement and
28
///
-3-
1
consent decree negotiations, the parties jointly request that this Court issue an Order staying these
2
proceedings until November 12, 2018.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, with the
4
approval of the Court, as follows: All proceedings in this lawsuit are hereby stayed until November
5
12, 2018.
6
7
Dated: August 13, 2018.
JEFFREY H. WOOD
Acting Assistant Attorney General
8
By:
/s/ Michael C. Martinez
Michael C. Martinez (CA Bar No. 275581)
Michael.C.Martinez@usdoj.gov
Environmental Defense Section
601 D Street N.W., Suite 8000
Washington D.C. 20004
Tel. (202) 514-0135
9
10
11
12
13
Attorney for Respondent
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Dated: August 13, 2018.
DYER LAWRENCE, LLP
By:
/s/ Francis C. Flaherty
Francis C. Flaherty
FFlaherty@dyerlawrence.com
2805 Mountain Street
Carson City, Nevada 89703
(775) 885-1896
FAX: (775) 885-8728
Attorney for Petitioner.
21
22
2805 Mountain Street
Carson City, Nevada 89703
(775) 885-1896
IT IS SO ORDERED:
24
Dyer Lawrence, LLP
23
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
25
August 13,
DATED: ______________, 2018
26
27
28
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?