Medchoice Risk Retention Group, Inc.

Filing 58

ORDER granting ECF No. 48 Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record for defendants Robert G. Rand and Rand Family Care LLC; a copy of this order and all documents hereafter to be served on defendants via regular mail; the corporate defendant must file a substitution of counsel by 2/7/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 1/9/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA MEDCHOICE RISK RETENTION ) GROUP, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ROBERT G. RAND, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________ ) AND RELATED CLAIMS ) ______________________________) PRESENT: 3:16-CV-0418-MMD (VPC) MINUTES OF THE COURT January 9, 2018 THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: LISA MANN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS: Victor Alan Perry, Esq. and the law firm of Perry & Westbrook filed a motion to withdraw as counsel for defendants Robert G. Rand, and Rand Family Care LLC (ECF No. 48). No opposition was filed. The motion to withdraw as counsel (ECF No. 48) is GRANTED. A copy of this order and all documents hereafter filed shall be served on defendants via regular mail at the following address: Robert G. Rand Rand Family Care LLC c/o Robert G. Rand Washoe County Detention Center Inmate No. 1607561 911 Parr Blvd. Reno, NV 89512 Defendants are advised that the Ninth Circuit has held that a “corporation may appear in federal court only through licensed counsel.” United States v. High Country Broad Co., 3 F.3d 1244, 1245 (9th Cir. 1993). Therefore, the corporate defendant shall file a substitution of counsel on or before Wednesday, February 7, 2018. IT IS SO ORDERED. By: DEBRA K. KEMPI, CLERK /s/ Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?