Bennett v. State of Nevada
Filing
13
ORDER denying ECF No. 10 Motion to Recuse; denying ECF No. 11 Motion for Subpoena. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/17/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
______________________________________
)
)
GREGORY J. BENNETT,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
vs.
)
)
STATE OF NEVADA,
)
)
Respondent.
)
)
3:16-cv-00420-RCJ-WGC
ORDER
12
13
Petitioner Gregory Bennett is a prisoner in the custody of the Nevada Department of
14
Corrections. He filed a Petition for a Writ of Prohibition in this Court. The Magistrate Judge
15
recommended dismissing the Petition without prejudice because Petitioner complained of
16
constitutional violations at his trial in state court that were not cognizable under Heck v.
17
Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). The Court agreed. Petitioner has now asked the undersigned
18
to recuse. The Court denies the motion. Judgment has been entered, and Petitioner has no
19
standing to request recusal of a judge before whom no action is pending. See United States v.
20
Conforte, 624 F.2d 869, 879–80 (9th Cir. 1980) (Kennedy, J.) (holding that absent exceptional
21
circumstances, grounds for disqualification must be raised before the judicial action at issue).
22
There are no exceptional circumstances here. Anyway, nowhere in his motion does Petitioner
23
identify any source of alleged bias.
24
1
2
3
1 of 2
CONCLUSION
1
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Recuse (ECF No. 10) and the Motion for
3
Subpoena (ECF No. 11) are DENIED.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated this 30th day ofday of October, 2016.
DATED: This 17th September, 2016.
6
7
8
_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
1
2
3
2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?