Rosaschi v. Wickham et al

Filing 25

ORDER that Petitioner's unopposed motion for extension of time to file motion to reopen (ECF No. 23 ) is granted; Clerk directed to reopen this case and lift the stay; Petitioner's motion to voluntarily dismiss petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 24 ) is granted; this action is dismissed without prejudice; Clerk instructed to enter judgment accordingly and close this action. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/18/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 *** 5 JAMIE ROSASCHI, Case No. 3:16-cv-00443-MMD-WGC Petitioner, 6 ORDER v. 7 HAROLD WICKHAM, et al., 8 Respondents. 9 10 Petitioner has filed an unopposed motion for extension of time to file motion to 11 reopen (ECF No. 23) and a motion to voluntarily dismiss petition for writ of habeas corpus 12 (ECF No. 24). Respondents have not responded to the latter motion, and the Court 13 assumes that Respondents do not oppose it. LR 7-2(d). The Court will grant Petitioner's 14 motions. The dismissal will be without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(B) and 15 41(a)(2). However, the Court makes no statement about the applicability of any procedural 16 defenses if Petitioner files another habeas corpus petition that challenges his custody 17 under the same judgment of conviction. 18 19 It is therefore ordered that Petitioner's unopposed motion for extension of time to file motion to reopen (ECF No. 23) is granted. 20 It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court reopen this case and lift the stay. 21 It is further ordered that Petitioner's motion to voluntarily dismiss petition for writ of 22 habeas corpus (ECF No. 24) is granted. This action is dismissed without prejudice. The 23 Clerk of the Court is instructed to enter judgment accordingly and close this action. 24 DATED THIS 18th day of June 2019. 25 26 27 28 MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?