Smith v. Baca et al
Filing
6
JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 4/28/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case r
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
****
DISTRICT OF
NEVADA
TANIKO SMITH,
Plaintiff,
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
v.
CASE NUMBER: 3:16-cv-00456-MMD-WGC
ISIDRO BACA, et al.,
Defendant(s).
Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried
and the jury has rendered its verdict.
Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been
tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.
X
Decision by Court. This action came to be considered before the Court. The issues have been
considered and a decision has been rendered.
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the due process claim is dismissed, with prejudice,
against Defendants Baca, Ward, and McDaniel, as amendment would be futile.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the equal protection claim is dismissed, with prejudice,
against Defendants Baca, Ward, and McDaniel, as amendment would be futile.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court certifies that any in forma pauperis appeal would
not be taken "in good faith" pursuant to 28 USC 1915(a)(3).
April 28, 2017
DEBRA K. KEMPI
Clerk
/s/ K. Rusin
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?