Nicholson v. Baker et al

Filing 89

ORDER - It is therefore ordered that Nicholson's motion to extend time (ECF No. 88 ) is granted. Nicholson will have until December 19, 2022, to file a reply in support of the Third Amended Petition (ECF No. 71 , Answer ECF No. 84 ). Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/21/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CJS)

Case 3:16-cv-00486-MMD-CSD Document 89 Filed 11/21/22 Page 1 of 1

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

5

***

6
7
8
9

RICHARD NICHOLSON,
v.
RENEE BAKER, et al.,

Case No. 3:16-cv-00486-MMD-CSD
Petitioner,

ORDER

Respondents.

10
11

Petitioner Richard Nicholson filed an unopposed motion to extend time to file a

12

reply in support of his third amended petition (second request) (ECF No. 88 (“Motion”)).

13

The Court finds that the request is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of

14

delay. Thus, good cause exists to grant the Motion.

15

It is therefore ordered that Nicholson’s motion to extend time (ECF No. 88) is

16

granted. Nicholson will have until December 19, 2022, to file a reply in support of the Third

17

Amended Petition.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

DATED THIS 21st Day of November 2022.
_______________________________
MIRANDA M. DU
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE