Williams v. Baker et al

Filing 48

ORDER granting ECF No. 47 Motion to Extend Time to respond to ECF No. 39 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Respondents' response/answer due 11/13/2017. In all other respects, the scheduled set forth in ECF No. 38 Order remains in effect. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 09/28/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 *** 9 10 11 MATHEW LEE WILLIAMS, Case No. 3:16-cv-00505-MMD-VPC Petitioner, ORDER v. 12 13 BRIAN E. WILLIAMS SR., et al., Respondents. 14 15 16 In this habeas corpus action, the petitioner, Mathew Lee Williams, has filed an 17 amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 34). Respondents were due to 18 respond to the amended petition by September 28, 2017. See Order entered June 30, 19 2017 (ECF No. 38). 20 On September 28, 2017, respondents filed a motion for extension of time (ECF 21 No. 47), requesting a 46-day extension of time, to November 13, 2017, for their response 22 to Williams’ amended petition. Respondents’ counsel states that she needs the extension 23 of time because of her obligations in other cases. 24 The Court finds that respondents’ motion for extension of time is made in good 25 faith and not solely for the purpose of delay, and there is good cause for the requested 26 extension of time. 27 It is therefore ordered that respondents’ Motion for Enlargement of Time (ECF No. 28 47) is granted. Respondents will have until and including November 13, 2017, to respond 1 to the petitioner’s amended petition for writ of habeas corpus. In all other respects, the 2 schedule set forth in the order entered June 30, 2017 (ECF No. 38) remains in effect. 3 4 DATED THIS 28th day of September 2017. 5 6 MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?