Excedis Corporation vs Edward Bollmann, et al

Filing 109

ORDER that Courtroom Administrator to set a hearing on ECF No. 107 Motion to Extend Time; docket to reflect 3rd Party Defendants Ripley, patrick and Jean Hogan and Catherine Mead as proceeding pro se, add mailing address and serve order on same. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 6/6/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8
9
10
11
12
13

EXCEDIS CORPORATION, a Nevada
limited liability company,

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
EDWARD BOLLMAN, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
______________________________________)

3:16-cv-00514-HDM-WGC
ORDER

14
15

Before the court is the “Request” of Plaintiff Excedis Corporation seeking an extension of time within

16

which to retain counsel (ECF No. 107). The motion was submitted by “Jean Hogan for Plaintiff Excedis

17

Corporation” (Id. at 2).

18

In its order of May 8, 2018, the court allowed the withdrawal of Attorney Elizabeth Stallard and her

19

law firm Downey Brand, LLP. The court further advised the parties that “Excedis Corporation could not

20

proceed without counsel” and that “. . . a corporation may only appear in federal court through licensed

21

counsel.” (ECF No. 101 at 2; citations omitted.) The request for the extension of time by Ms. Hogan, who

22

is not an attorney, on behalf of Excedis Corporation, is therefore a fugitive document and summarily could be

23

stricken from the docket. Nevertheless, the court will direct its Courtroom Administrator to set a hearing on

24

ECF No. 107 as soon as the court’s calendar may accommodate it.

25
26

Defendants/Counterclaimants/Third Party Plaintiffs Bollman and Kerr may file a response to the
“Request” prior to the time that this matter is set for a hearing.

27

As was also stated in this court’s May 8, 2018, order, this order does not preclude

28

Defendants/Counterclaimants/Third Party Plaintiffs Bollman and Kerr from seeking “what relief they deem
appropriate under the circumstances . . .” (ECF No. 101 at 3.)

1

As there was no similar request for an extension of the individuals previously represented by

2

Stallard/Downey Brand, the docket shall reflect Third Party Defendants Thomas Ripley, Patrick Hogan, Jean

3

Hogan, and Catherine Mead are proceeding pro se. Their mailing and email addresses shall be reflected as

4

follows:

5
6

Thomas Ripley
3 Highmeadow Court
Algonquin, Illinois 60102
[e-mail]

7
8
9
10
11

Patrick Hogan
1020 Oakleaf Avenue
Monrovia, California 91016
[e-mail]
Jean Hogan
1020 Oakleaf Avenue
Monrovia, California 91016
[e-mail]

12
13
14
15

Catherine Mead
President & Registered Agent
Resident Agent National, Inc.
4650 Wedekind Road, Suite 2
Sparks, Nevada 89431
[e-mail]

16

This order will be served on the pro se parties at their addresses noted above.

17

The parties are again reminded, as was also stated in this court’s order of May 8, 2018, that the

18

deadlines established by the court at the hearing on April 16, 2018 (ECF No. 91), would remain intact.

19

(ECF No. 101 at 3.)

20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21

DATED: June 6, 2018.

22
____________________________________
WILLIAM G. COBB
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

23
24
25
26
27
28
2