Excedis Corporation vs Edward Bollmann, et al

Filing 120

ORDER that the court accepts the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 116 ) in whole; Excedis' complaint (ECF No. 1 , Ex. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice; and Excedis' answer to the Bollman-Kerr counterclaim (ECF No. 7 ) is STRICKEN. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 8/6/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6

***

7
8
9

EXCEDIS CORPORATION, a Nevada Case No. 3:16-cv-00514-HDM-WGC
limited liability company,
ORDER
Plaintiff,
v.

10
11

EDWARD BOLLMAN, an individual,
JAMES KERR, an individual, et al.,

12

Defendants.

13
On July 9, 2018, Magistrate Judge Cobb issued a Report and Recommendation
14
15
16

(ECF No. 116) recommending that plaintiff Excedis Corporation’s (Excedis) complaint be
dismissed without prejudice and that Excedis’ answer to defendants Edward Bollman’s
and James Kerr’s counterclaim be stricken.

The time to object to the Report and

17
Recommendation has expired and no objections have been filed. Pursuant to Local Rule
18
IB 3-2(b), the court accepts the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 116) in whole.
19
20

Thus, Excedis’ complaint (ECF No. 1, Ex. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice and
Excedis’ answer to the Bollman-Kerr counterclaim (ECF No. 7) is STRICKEN.

21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23

DATED THIS 6th day of August, 2018.

24
25
26

HOWARD D. MCKIBBEN,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

27
28
1