Excedis Corporation vs Edward Bollmann, et al
Filing
145
ORDER dismissing without prejudice the remaining claims in this action; directing Clerk to close case. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 12/21/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
Case 3:16-cv-00514-HDM-WGC Document 145 Filed 12/21/20 Page 1 of 2
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
4
5
6
EXCEDIS CORPORATION,
Case No. 3:16-cv-00514-HDM-WGC
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
7
EDWARD BOLLMAN, and JAMES KERR,
8
Defendants.
_______________________________
9
10
EDWARD BOLLMAN, and JAMES KERR,
Counterclaimants,
11
12
13
v.
EXCEDIS CORPORATION,
14
Counterdefendant.
_______________________________
15
EDWARD BOLLMAN, and JAMES KERR,
16
17
18
19
20
Third Party Plaintiffs,
v.
THOMAS RIPLEY, PATRICK HOGAN,
JEAN HOGAN, and CATHERINE MEAD,
Third Party Defendants.
21
The only remaining claims in this action are those of third
22
party plaintiffs Edward Bollman and James Kerr. On October 16,
23
2020, the court entered an order directing Bollman and Kerr to, on
24
or before November 16, 2020, either provide the court notice that
25
they had obtained substitute counsel or to file a case status
26
report indicating whether they intend to proceed further with this
27
action. Neither Bollman nor Kerr filed any response to the court’s
28
1
Case 3:16-cv-00514-HDM-WGC Document 145 Filed 12/21/20 Page 2 of 2
1
order. On November 18, 2020, the court therefore ordered Bollman
2
and Kerr to show cause why this action should not be dismissed. No
3
response to the court’s order to show cause having been filed by
4
the applicable deadline, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the remaining
5
claims in this action are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
6
of Court shall accordingly CLOSE this case.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
The Clerk
DATED: This 21st day of December, 2020.
9
10
11
____________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?