Excedis Corporation vs Edward Bollmann, et al

Filing 145

ORDER dismissing without prejudice the remaining claims in this action; directing Clerk to close case. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 12/21/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Download PDF
Case 3:16-cv-00514-HDM-WGC Document 145 Filed 12/21/20 Page 1 of 2 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 5 6 EXCEDIS CORPORATION, Case No. 3:16-cv-00514-HDM-WGC Plaintiff, ORDER v. 7 EDWARD BOLLMAN, and JAMES KERR, 8 Defendants. _______________________________ 9 10 EDWARD BOLLMAN, and JAMES KERR, Counterclaimants, 11 12 13 v. EXCEDIS CORPORATION, 14 Counterdefendant. _______________________________ 15 EDWARD BOLLMAN, and JAMES KERR, 16 17 18 19 20 Third Party Plaintiffs, v. THOMAS RIPLEY, PATRICK HOGAN, JEAN HOGAN, and CATHERINE MEAD, Third Party Defendants. 21 The only remaining claims in this action are those of third 22 party plaintiffs Edward Bollman and James Kerr. On October 16, 23 2020, the court entered an order directing Bollman and Kerr to, on 24 or before November 16, 2020, either provide the court notice that 25 they had obtained substitute counsel or to file a case status 26 report indicating whether they intend to proceed further with this 27 action. Neither Bollman nor Kerr filed any response to the court’s 28 1 Case 3:16-cv-00514-HDM-WGC Document 145 Filed 12/21/20 Page 2 of 2 1 order. On November 18, 2020, the court therefore ordered Bollman 2 and Kerr to show cause why this action should not be dismissed. No 3 response to the court’s order to show cause having been filed by 4 the applicable deadline, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the remaining 5 claims in this action are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 6 of Court shall accordingly CLOSE this case. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 The Clerk DATED: This 21st day of December, 2020. 9 10 11 ____________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?