Drake v. Scheels Sporting Goods et al

Filing 34

ORDER denying as moot 32 Stipulation to Extend Discovery Responses and Non-Opposition to Motion to Withdraw. See Order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 1/20/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HJ)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
JESSIE JAMES DRAKE,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
SCHEELS SPORTING GOODS, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
________________________________________)

3:16-cv-00518-HDM-WGC
MINUTES OF THE COURT
January 20, 2017

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEPUTY CLERK:

KATIE LYNN OGDEN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before the court is the Stipulation to Extend Discovery Responses and for Non-Opposition
to Motion to Withdraw (ECF No. 32). In their Stipulation, the parties request an additional two
weeks from the filing of the Stipulation to respond to Defendants’ separate first set of interrogatories,
requests for production and requests for admissions.
A Stipulation between the parties for an extension for a party to extend the time to respond
to another party’s discovery does not require approval by the court. Similarly, an agreement not to
oppose a certain motion does not require either a stipulation of counsel nor an order of the court.
The Stipulation to Extend Discovery Responses and for Non-Opposition to Motion to
Withdraw (ECF No. 32) is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DEBRA K. KEMPI, CLERK
By:

/s/
Deputy Clerk