Seiko Epson Corporation et al v. InkSystem LLC et al
ORDER ADOPTING AND ACCEPTING ECF No. 112 Report and Recommendation: Plaintiff's Motion for Case Terminating Sanctions (ECF No. 91 ) is GRANTED. Defendants ART LLC, AF LLC, INKREDIBLE LLC, Andriy Kravchuk, Artem Koshkalda, Igor ielov, and Vitalii Maliuk's Answers (ECF Nos. 41 , 49 ) are STRICKEN from the Docket and the Clerk of the Court shall enter Defaults accordingly. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 8/22/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION, et al.,
CASE NO.: 3:16-CV-00524-RCJ-VPC
INKSYSTEM LLC, et al.,
Before the Court is the Reports and Recommendations of U.S. Magistrate Judge (ECF #1121)
entered on August 3, 2017, recommending that the Court grant Plaintiffs’ Motion for Case Terminating
Sanctions (ECF No. 91) and Defendants ART LLC, AF LLC, INKREDIBLE LLC, Andriy Kravchuk,
Artem Koshkalda, Igor Bielov, and Vitalii Maliuk’s Answers (ECF Nos. 41, 49) be stricken and their
Recommendation Regarding Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 153).
On August 16, 2017, Defendants filed their Objections to Report and
The Court has conducted it’s de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of
the Plaintiff, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge’s
Reports and Recommendation (ECF #112) entered on August 3, 2017, should be ADOPTED AND
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Case Terminating Sanctions (ECF No.
91) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants ART LLC, AF LLC, INKREDIBLE LLC, Andriy
Kravchuk, Artem Koshkalda, Igor ielov, and Vitalii Maliuk’s Answers (ECF Nos. 41, 49) are
STRICKEN from the Docket and the Clerk of the Court shall enter Defaults accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of August, 2017.
ROBERT C. JONES
Refers to court’s docket number.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?