Bradshaw v. Miller
MINUTE ORDER - Clerk shall SEND plaintiff the approved 1983 form and instructions. (Mailed to plaintiff on 10/26/2017) Amended complaint due by 11/25/2017. Plaintiff's emergency motions do not comply with the requirements for seeking em ergency relief under Local Rule 7-4; therefore, the motions attached to plaintiff's application for in forma pauperis are DENIED. To the extent plaintiff is seeking the court to revisit decisions made in any of her previous cases, that request is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 10/26/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
GRANT D. MILLER,
MINUTES OF THE COURT
October 26, 2017
THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
REPORTER: NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Plaintiff has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff has
has attached to her application several pages of paper alleging, among other things, that a Dr.
Grant Miller is “play[ing] commercials he recorded over my speakers so I can’t watch the
shows.” Plaintiff also complains bitterly about retired Judges Hagen and McQuaid and decisions
they rendered on cases she filed in 1998 and 1999.
However, plaintiff has not filed a complaint in this matter. Pursuant to Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 3, “[a] civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the court.”
Fed.R.Civ.P. 3. The clerk of the court shall SEND to plaintiff the approved form for filing a 42
U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and instructions for the same. Plaintiff thirty (30) days from the date of
this order to submit a complaint to this court. If Plaintiff does not timely comply with this order,
dismissal of this action may result.
Plaintiff’s emergency motions do not comply with the requirements for seeking
emergency relief under Local Rule 7-4; therefore, the motions attached to plaintiff’s application
for in forma pauperis are DENIED. To the extent plaintiff is seeking the court to revisit
decisions made in any of her previous cases, that request is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DEBRA K. KEMPI, CLERK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?