Robert L. Citroen, Law Corporation v. Micron Optics, Inc.

Filing 92

ORDER granting ECF No. 91 Stipulation to Extend Deadline for Filing Joint Pretrial Order (First Request). Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 7/18/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 5/29/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)

Case 3:16-cv-00570-RCJ-WGC Document 91 Filed 05/25/18 Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

PATRICK H. HICKS, ESQ., Bar # 4632
SANDRA KETNER, ESQ., Bar # 8527
MONTGOMERY PAEK, ESQ., Bar # 10176
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
200 S. Virginia St.
8th Floor
Reno, NV 89501
Telephone: [phone]
Fax No.:
775.786.0127
Email:
[e-mail]
Email:
[e-mail]
Email:
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
MICRON OPTICS, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9
10
11

DISTRICT OF NEVADA
ROBERT L. CITROEN, LAW CORPORATION, a
Nevada Corporation,

12

Plaintiff,

13

vs.

14

MICRON OPTICS, INC., a Georgia
Corporation and JOHN DOES I through X,
ABC Corporations I through X, and Black and
White Companies I through X,

15
16
17

Case No. 3:16-cv-00570-RCJ-WGC
STIPULATION TO EXTEND
DEADLINE FOR FILING JOINT
PRETRIAL ORDER
[FIRST REQUEST]

Defendants.

18

MICRON OPTICS, INC., a Georgia
Corporation,

19

Counterclaimant,

20

vs.

21

ROBERT L. CITROEN, LAW CORPORATION, a
Nevada Corporation; ROBERT L. CITROEN,
an individual, DOES I-X, inclusive, and ROES
I-X, inclusive,

22
23

Counter-Defendants.

24
25

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant ROBERT L. CITROEN, LAW CORPORATION and Counter-

26

Defendant

27

Defendant/Counterclaimant MICRON OPTICS, INC. (hereinafter “Micron”), by and through

28

their respective counsel, do hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for filing the

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
200 S. Virginia St.
8th Floor
Reno, NV 89501
775.348.4888

ROBERT

L.

CITROEN

(hereinafter

collectively

“Citroen”)

and

Case 3:16-cv-00570-RCJ-WGC Document 91 Filed 05/25/18 Page 2 of 3

1

joint pretrial order pursuant to Local Rule 26-4 by thirty (30) days.

2

On May 17, 2017, this Court issued an Order (ECF No. 90) denying Citroen’s Motion

3

for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 76) and granting in part and denying in part Micron’s

4

Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 73). Pursuant to the parties’ Joint Discovery Plan

5

and Scheduling Order (ECF No. 15), if dispositive motions are filed, the deadline for filing

6

the Joint Pretrial Order will be suspended until thirty (30) days after the decision on the

7

dispositive motions or further court order. Thirty (30) days after the Court’s Order on the

8

parties’ dispositive motions is Saturday, June 16, 2018.

9

Pretrial order is currently due on Monday, June 18, 2018.

10

Therefore, the parties’ Joint

In light of the Court’s Order, the parties have consulted and are informally engaged

11

in attempts to resolve the matter.

12

mediator (Hon. Brent Adams (Ret.)) to conduct a mediation in late June or early July,

13

which is the earliest that the parties can attend a mediation in Reno due to both parties’

14

representatives having to travel from out of state (i.e., Atlanta and California) and Mr.

15

Citroen’s advanced age. In an effort to avoid additional attorneys’ fees and focus on trying

16

to resolve the matter, the parties request a thirty (30) day extension of the deadline for

17

submission of the Joint Pretrial Order up to and including Wednesday, July 18, 2018.

Additionally, the parties intend to retain a private

18

In accordance with Local Rule 26-4, any further requests to extend any discovery

19

deadlines will be made no later than twenty-one (21) days before the expiration of the

20

subject deadline and must be supported by a showing of good cause for the extension.

21

This request for extension made by the parties is made in good faith and not for the

22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
200 S. Virginia St.
8th Floor
Reno, NV 89501
775.348.4888

2.

Case 3:16-cv-00570-RCJ-WGC Document 91 Filed 05/25/18 Page 3 of 3

1

purpose of delay. This request for an extension is limited to only those deadlines set forth

2

herein. The Court has not set a trial date for this matter.
Dated: May 25, 2018
Dated: May 25, 2018

3
4
5
6
7
8

/s/Stephen S. Kent, Esq.

/s/Sandra Ketner, Esq.

STEPHEN S. KENT, ESQ.
KENT LAW, PLLC

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendants
ROBERT L. CITROEN, LAW
CORPORATION and ROBERT L. CITROEN

PATRICK H. HICKS, ESQ.
SANDRA KETNER, ESQ.
MONTGOMERY PAEK, ESQ.

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant
MICRON OPTICS, INC.
ORDER

9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11

May
29th
Dated this ____ day of ___________, 2018.

12
____________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

13
14

Firmwide:154950961.1 086337.1002

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
200 S. Virginia St.
8th Floor
Reno, NV 89501
775.348.4888

3.