Espinosa v. Carpenter et al

Filing 7

ORDER - The motion for voluntary dismissal (ECF No. 6 ) is granted. It is further ordered that this action is dismissed in its entirety without prejudice. It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/21/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 *** BENJAMIN W. ESPINOSA, 9 10 11 Case No. 3:16-cv-00573-MMD-VPC Plaintiff, ORDER v. TARA CARPENTER et al., Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiff, a pro se prisoner, previously filed an application to proceed in forma 14 pauperis and a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1, 1-1.) The 15 Court has not yet screened the complaint. 16 Plaintiff now files a motion for voluntary dismissal. (ECF No. 6.) Pursuant to 17 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), a plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court 18 order by filing “a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or 19 a motion for summary judgment.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The Court grants Plaintiff’s 20 motion to voluntarily dismiss this action because no responsive pleading has been filed 21 in this case. As such, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice. 22 23 For the foregoing reasons, it is ordered that the motion for voluntary dismissal (ECF No. 6) is granted. 24 It is further ordered that this action is dismissed in its entirety without prejudice. 25 It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment accordingly. 26 DATED THIS 21st day of June, 2017. 27 28 MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?