Hidalgo v. LeGrand et al

Filing 90

ORDER - Respondents' Motion (ECF No. 88 ) is granted. Respondents will have up to and including May 6, 2022, to file an answer to the remaining claims in the third amended petition (ECF No. 67 ). The Clerk of Court is directed to strike the proper-person supplement to the third amended petition (ECF No. 89 ). Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/7/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HKL)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

5

***

6

LUIS ALONSO HIDALGO, III,

Case No. 3:16-cv-00618-MMD-CSD

Petitioner,

7

ORDER

v.
8
ROBERT LEGRAND, et al.,
9
Respondents.
10
11

Respondents have filed an unopposed motion for enlargement of time (first

12

request). (ECF No. 88 (“Motion”).) The Court finds that good cause exists to grant the

13

Motion.

14

Petitioner Luis Hidalgo has filed a proper-person supplement to the third amended

15

petition. (ECF No. 89.) Petitioner cannot file proper-person documents in this action

16

because counsel represents him. See LR IA 11-6(a). As such, the Court will strike these

17

documents.

18

It is therefore ordered that Respondents’ Motion (ECF No. 88) is granted.

19

Respondents will have up to and including May 6, 2022, to file an answer to the remaining

20

claims in the third amended petition (ECF No. 67).

21
22
23

The Clerk of Court is directed to strike the proper-person supplement to the third
amended petition (ECF No. 89).
DATED THIS 7th Day of March 2022.

24
25
26
27
28

MIRANDA M. DU
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE