Salas v. Koehn et al

Filing 95

ORDER - The request for additional time, (ECF No. 91 ), is DENIED as moot. Salas timely filed his opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 92 / 93 .) To the extent Salas is separately requesting the appointment of counsel, that motion is DENIED for the reasons set forth in the Courts order ECF No. 10 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 8/23/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SMR)

Case 3:16-cv-00635-RCJ-CLB Document 95 Filed 08/23/21 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

2
3
4

JERRY SALAS,

Case No. 3:16-CV-0635-RCJ-CLB
Plaintiff,

5
6
7
8

v.

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT MOTION
TO EXTEND TIME AND/OR FOR
APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

DR. MICHAEL KOEHN, et al.,

[ECF No. 91]

Defendant.

9
10

Plaintiff Jerry Salas (“Salas”) filed a motion requesting additional time to file an

11

opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and/or for the appointment of

12

counsel. (ECF No. 91.) In the motion, Salas claims his opposition paper was in the hands

13

of another inmate who was assisting him, and Salas needed either additional time and/or

14

appointed counsel to retrieve and file this opposition. (Id.)

15
16
17
18

The request for additional time, (ECF No. 91), is DENIED as moot. Salas timely
filed his opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 92/93.) To
the extent Salas is separately requesting the appointment of counsel, that motion is
DENIED for the reasons set forth in the Court’s order ECF No. 10.

19
20

DATED: August 23, 2021.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

___________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE