Bolanos v. Baker et al

Filing 63

ORDER - Respondents' unopposed first motion for extension oftime to file a reply in support of their motion to dismiss (ECF No. 62 ) is granted nunc protunc. Reply is due by July 20, 2023. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/21/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)

Case 3:16-cv-00640-MMD-CSD Document 63 Filed 06/21/23 Page 1 of 1

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

5

***

6

ARTURO C. BOLANOS,

7

Case No. 3:16-cv-00640-MMD-CSD
Petitioner,

ORDER

v.
8
RENEE BAKER, et al.,
9
Respondents.
10
11

Respondents ask the Court for an extension of time to file their reply in support of

12

their motion to dismiss Arturo C. Bolanos’ second-amended 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas

13

corpus petition. (ECF No. 62.) The Court finds good cause exists to grant the motion.

14

It is therefore ordered that Respondents’ unopposed first motion for extension of

15

time to file a reply in support of their motion to dismiss (ECF No. 62) is granted nunc pro

16

tunc. The deadline to file the response is extended to July 20, 2023.

17

DATED THIS 21st Day of June 2023.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

MIRANDA M. DU
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE