Mankel v. Government Employees Insurance Company

Filing 40

ORDER - The court ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 25 ). Plaintiff's motion for an order to show cause why Daliz Rodriguez should not be held in contempt (ECF No. 21 ) is GR ANTED. Mr. Rodriguez is hereby ordered to reimburse plaintiff for costs in the amount of $1,180.70 for his failure to comply with his deposition subpoena on May 4, 2017. Mr. Rodriguez is further ordered to show cause before this court why he should not be held in contempt for the same. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 9/22/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

DENNIS MANKEL,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE
)
COMPANY,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_________________________________ )

3:16-cv-00657-HDM-VPC
ORDER

17

Before the court is the report and recommendation of the

18

United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 25) recommending that the

19

court grant the plaintiff’s motion for order to show cause (ECF No.

20

21).

21

filed, and the time for doing so has expired.

22

No objections to the report and recommendation have been

The court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the

23

parties and other relevant matters of record and has made a review

24

and determination in accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C.

25

§ 636 and applicable case law, and good cause appearing, the court

26

hereby ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the report and recommendation of the

27

United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 25).

28

Accordingly, the plaintiff’s motion for an order to show cause
1

1

why Daliz Rodriguez should not be held in contempt (ECF No. 21) is

2

GRANTED.

3

for costs in the amount of $1,180.70 for his failure to comply with

4

his deposition subpoena on May 4, 2017.

5

ordered to show cause before this court why he should not be held

6

in contempt for the same.

7

separate order.

8

court at the designated time, the court will consider whether to

9

adjudicate Mr. Rodriguez in contempt and issue a bench warrant for

10

Mr. Rodriguez is hereby ordered to reimburse plaintiff

Mr. Rodriguez is further

The show cause hearing will be set by

Should Mr. Rodriguez fail to appear before this

his arrest.

11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12

DATED: This 25th day of September, 2017.

13
14

____________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2