Young et al v. Mariscal et al

Filing 34

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke, on 4/7/2017, denying as moot Defendants' ECF No. 8 Motion to Dismiss Complaint. The Court will rule on ECF No. 17 Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint in due course. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
MELISSA YOUNG, et al.,

)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
ANDRES MARISCAL, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_____________________________ )
PRESENT:

3:16-CV-0678-VPC
MINUTES OF THE COURT
April 7, 2017

THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DEPUTY CLERK:

LISA MANN

REPORTER: NONE APPEARING

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before this court is defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint (ECF No. 8). In
the opposition (ECF No. 11) and reply (ECF No. 14), all parties concede that the motion to
dismiss is now moot because plaintiffs’ filed an amended complaint (ECF No. 10). Defendants
have now moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint (ECF No. 17). Therefore,
Defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint (ECF No. 8) is DENIED as moot.
The court will rule on defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint (ECF No. 17) in
due course.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DEBRA K. KEMPI, CLERK
By:

/s/
Deputy Clerk