Sudberry v. Baca et al

Filing 10

ORDER denying Petitioner's ECF No. 9 Motion for Judgment; directing Clerk to return unfiled to Petitioner any document intended for filing in this action, other than a notice of appeal from this order. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 5/22/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6
7
8
9

DENNIS KIRK SUDBERRY,

10

Petitioner,

11

vs.

12

Case No. 3:16-cv-00687-RCJ-WGC

ISIDRO BACA, et al.,

13

ORDER

Respondents.

14
15
16

Petitioner has filed a third motion for judgment (ECF No. 9). Again, the motion is moot
because the court already has dismissed the action. ECF No. 3.

17

Petitioner repeats the complaints that he alleged in his second motion for judgment (ECF

18

No. 7). Petitioner is wasting the court’s time with these continuous motions. The court will restrict

19

petitioner from filing anything in this action other than a notice of appeal from this order.

20
21

Reasonable jurists would not find the court’s conclusions to be debatable or wrong, and the
court will not issue a certificate of appealability.

22

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for judgment (ECF No. 9) is

23

DENIED as moot.

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///

1
2
3

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall return unfiled to petitioner any
document intended for filing in this action, other than a notice of appeal from this order.
DATED:
DATED: This 22nd day of May, 2017.

4
5

_________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-