Sudberry v. Baca et al
Filing
3
ORDER directing Clerk to send Petitioner a blank IFP form (mailed 1/24/2017); dismissing without prejudice this action; directing Clerk to enter judgment accordingly; denying a certificate of appealabilty. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 1/24/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
DENNIS KIRK SUDBERRY,
10
Petitioner,
11
vs.
12
Case No. 3:16-cv-00687-RCJ-WGC
ISIDRO BACA, et al.,
13
ORDER
Respondents.
14
15
Petitioner has submitted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.
16
The court dismisses this action because petitioner did not pay the filing fee, nor did he submit an
17
application to proceed in forma pauperis with a financial certificate and a copy of his inmate
18
account statement, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and Local Rule LSR 1-2.
19
20
Reasonable jurists would not find this conclusion to be debatable or wrong, and the court
will not issue a certificate of appealability.
21
22
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall send petitioner a blank form
for an application to proceed in forma pauperis for incarcerated litigants.
23
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice to
24
petitioner’s commencement of a new action in which he either pays the filing fee in full or submits
25
a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis, accompanied by a signed financial certificate
26
and a statement of his inmate account. The clerk of the court shall enter judgment accordingly and
27
close this action.
28
///
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED.
2
DATED:
January 24, 2017.
3
4
_________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?