Deutsche Bank National Trust Company As Indenture Trustee for American Home Mortgage Investment Trust 2007-1, Mortgage-Backed Notes and Grantor Trust Certificates, Series 2007-1 v. Ruby Red Investments, LLC, Series K et al
Filing
36
ORDER granting ECF No. 35 Stipulation : Response to ECF No. 31 Motion for Summary Judgment due by 2/1/2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/11/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
2
3
4
5
DAVID E. ADKINS, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 4503
611 Sierra Rose Drive, Suite B
Reno, NV 89511
(775) 636-6222
david@algnv.com
Attorney for Ruby Red Investments, LLC, Series K
and High Sierra Ranch Homes Owners' Association
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
CASE NO.: 3:16-cv-00704-MMD-VPC
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST
COMPANY, AS INDENTURE TRUSTEE
FOR AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE
INVESTMENT TRUST 2007-1, MORTGAGE
BACKED NOTES AND GRANTOR TRUST
CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-1,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN
WHICH TO RESPOND TO MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(Second Request)
Plaintiffs.
vs.
RUBY RED INVESTMENTS, LLC, SERIES
K, a Nevada Limited Liability Corporation;
HIGH SIERRA RANCH HOMES OWNERS'
ASSOCIATION, a Nevada nonprofit
corporation.
17
Defendants.
18
19
RUBY RED INVESTMENTS, LLC, SERIES
K, a Nevada Limited Liability Corporation,
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Counterclaimant,
vs.
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST
COMPANY, AS INDENTURE TRUSTEE
FOR AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE
INVESTMENT TRUST 2007-1, MORTGAGE
BACKED NOTES AND GRANTOR TRUST
CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-1,
Counterdefendants.
27
28
-1-
1
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Indenture Trustee for
2
American Home Mortgage Investment Trust 2007-1, Mortgage-Backed Notes and Grantor Trust
3
Certificates, Series 2007-1 (hereinafter “Deutsche Bank”), by and through its attorneys of record, the
4
5
6
7
law firm of Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP, Defendant/Counterclaimant, Ruby Red Investments, LLC,
Series K (hereinafter “Ruby Red”), by and through its attorneys of record, the Law Office of David E.
Adkins, and Defendant, High Sierra Ranch Home Owners’ Association (hereinafter “HOA”), by and
8
through its attorneys of record, the Law Office of David E. Adkins, hereby stipulate to an extension of
9
time in which Ruby Red and HOA have to respond to Deutsche Bank’s Motion for Summary Judgment
10
(ECF Dckt. No. 31) to February 1, 2018.
11
12
Defendants’ opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion were initially due on December 28, 2017, and were
13
extended to January 11, 2018, the current due date, by way of stipulation and Order. Good cause exists
14
to further extend the deadline, as the extension will allow the Defendants’ counsel an opportunity to
15
review more fully the points and authorities raised in Plaintiffs’ Motion and to respond thereto. In
16
addition, the parties have discussed settling their dispute and require additional time to negotiate a
17
18
19
settlement.
[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
1
This is the parties’ second request for an extension to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion, and is not
2
intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.
3
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
LAW OFFICE OF DAVID E. ADKINS
/s/Krista J. Nielson, Esq.
Dana Jonathon Nitz, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 0050
Krista J. Nielson, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10698
7785 W. Sahara Ave., Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89117
dnitz@wrightlegal.net
cconnolly@wrightlegal.net
knielson@wrightlegal.net
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,
Deutsche Bank
/s/David E. Adkins, Esq.
David E. Adkins, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 4503
611 Sierra Rose Drive, Suite B
Reno, Nevada 89511
(775) 636-6222
david@algnv.com
Attorney for Defendants, Ruby Red Investments,
LLC, Series K and High Sierra Ranch Home
Owners’ Association
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
january 11, 2018
DATED ___________________
17
18
19
District
UNITED STATES _____________________ JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?