Deutsche Bank National Trust Company As Indenture Trustee for American Home Mortgage Investment Trust 2007-1, Mortgage-Backed Notes and Grantor Trust Certificates, Series 2007-1 v. Ruby Red Investments, LLC, Series K et al

Filing 36

ORDER granting ECF No. 35 Stipulation : Response to ECF No. 31 Motion for Summary Judgment due by 2/1/2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/11/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 DAVID E. ADKINS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 4503 611 Sierra Rose Drive, Suite B Reno, NV 89511 (775) 636-6222 david@algnv.com Attorney for Ruby Red Investments, LLC, Series K and High Sierra Ranch Homes Owners' Association 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 CASE NO.: 3:16-cv-00704-MMD-VPC DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS INDENTURE TRUSTEE FOR AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE INVESTMENT TRUST 2007-1, MORTGAGE BACKED NOTES AND GRANTOR TRUST CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-1, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Second Request) Plaintiffs. vs. RUBY RED INVESTMENTS, LLC, SERIES K, a Nevada Limited Liability Corporation; HIGH SIERRA RANCH HOMES OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, a Nevada nonprofit corporation. 17 Defendants. 18 19 RUBY RED INVESTMENTS, LLC, SERIES K, a Nevada Limited Liability Corporation, 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Counterclaimant, vs. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS INDENTURE TRUSTEE FOR AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE INVESTMENT TRUST 2007-1, MORTGAGE BACKED NOTES AND GRANTOR TRUST CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-1, Counterdefendants. 27 28 -1- 1 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Indenture Trustee for 2 American Home Mortgage Investment Trust 2007-1, Mortgage-Backed Notes and Grantor Trust 3 Certificates, Series 2007-1 (hereinafter “Deutsche Bank”), by and through its attorneys of record, the 4 5 6 7 law firm of Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP, Defendant/Counterclaimant, Ruby Red Investments, LLC, Series K (hereinafter “Ruby Red”), by and through its attorneys of record, the Law Office of David E. Adkins, and Defendant, High Sierra Ranch Home Owners’ Association (hereinafter “HOA”), by and 8 through its attorneys of record, the Law Office of David E. Adkins, hereby stipulate to an extension of 9 time in which Ruby Red and HOA have to respond to Deutsche Bank’s Motion for Summary Judgment 10 (ECF Dckt. No. 31) to February 1, 2018. 11 12 Defendants’ opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion were initially due on December 28, 2017, and were 13 extended to January 11, 2018, the current due date, by way of stipulation and Order. Good cause exists 14 to further extend the deadline, as the extension will allow the Defendants’ counsel an opportunity to 15 review more fully the points and authorities raised in Plaintiffs’ Motion and to respond thereto. In 16 addition, the parties have discussed settling their dispute and require additional time to negotiate a 17 18 19 settlement. [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- 1 This is the parties’ second request for an extension to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion, and is not 2 intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party. 3 WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP LAW OFFICE OF DAVID E. ADKINS /s/Krista J. Nielson, Esq. Dana Jonathon Nitz, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 0050 Krista J. Nielson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10698 7785 W. Sahara Ave., Suite 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89117 dnitz@wrightlegal.net cconnolly@wrightlegal.net knielson@wrightlegal.net Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Deutsche Bank /s/David E. Adkins, Esq. David E. Adkins, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 4503 611 Sierra Rose Drive, Suite B Reno, Nevada 89511 (775) 636-6222 david@algnv.com Attorney for Defendants, Ruby Red Investments, LLC, Series K and High Sierra Ranch Home Owners’ Association 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. january 11, 2018 DATED ___________________ 17 18 19 District UNITED STATES _____________________ JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?