Fenton v. Baca et al

Filing 34

ORDER - It is therefore ordered that the Motion (ECF No. 30 ) is granted. Fenton has until and including November 30, 2023, to file a second-amended petition. In all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the order entered August 3, 2023 (ECF No. 27 ) will remain in effect. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/28/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)

Download PDF
Case 3:16-cv-00749-MMD-CLB Document 34 Filed 09/28/23 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 *** 6 JOHN MARK FENTON, Petitioner, 7 8 9 Case No. 3:16-cv-00749-MMD-CLB ORDER v. ISIDRO BACA, et al., Respondents. 10 11 The Court previously appointed counsel for Petitioner John Mark Fenton in this 12 habeas corpus action. (ECF No. 12.) Counsel made an initial appearance for Fenton and 13 moved for a stay. (ECF Nos. 13, 20.) On April 9, 2018, the Court granted the motion for 14 stay. (ECF No. 21.) On August 3, 2023, this Court reopened this matter and gave Fenton 15 60 days to file his first-amended petition. (ECF No. 27.) On September 12, 2023, Fenton 16 timely filed his first-amended petition and moved for leave to file a second-amended 17 petition. (ECF Nos. 28, 30 (“Motion”).) Respondents opposed the Motion, and Fenton 18 replied. (ECF Nos. 32, 33.) 19 In his Motion, Fenton states that he filed his first-amended petition as a protective 20 petition to ensure that all the claims would be preserved as timely filed. (ECF No. 30 at 21 2.) Fenton requests leave to file a second-amended petition so that he has a reasonable 22 opportunity to prepare an amended petition that fully reflects counsel’s considered 23 judgment. (Id. at 3.) Fenton further requests that the Court waive the requirement of LR 24 15-1(a), which generally requires a party to attach the proposed amended pleading to a 25 motion seeking leave of court to amend, explaining that the rule is ill-suited for this 26 situation. (Id. at 4.) 27 28 1 Case 3:16-cv-00749-MMD-CLB Document 34 Filed 09/28/23 Page 2 of 2 1 Local Rule 15-1(a) states that a proposed amended pleading must be submitted 2 with the motion for leave to amend unless otherwise permitted by the court. When the 3 court appoints counsel to represent habeas corpus petitioners, as a matter of course it 4 gives counsel leave to file an amended petition. The only difference here is that counsel 5 is trying to file a petition before the one-year deadline to minimize the probability that 6 grounds for relief would not relate back to a timely petition. The Court sees no reason to 7 depart from its usual practice in habeas corpus cases of allowing amended petitions 8 under these circumstances. Moreover, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), a 9 party may amend a pleading with the Court’s leave, and “[t]he court should freely give 10 leave when justice so requires.” 11 The Court finds that there is good cause for Fenton to file a second-amended 12 habeas petition, so the Court grants the Motion and waives the requirement of LR 15- 13 1(a). This order does not, however, affect, in any manner, the operation of the statute of 14 limitations in this case, and the Court does not mean in this order to convey any opinion 15 whatsoever about when the limitations period expires (or expired). 16 It is therefore ordered that the Motion (ECF No. 30) is granted. Fenton has until 17 and including November 30, 2023, to file a second-amended petition. In all other respects, 18 the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the order entered August 3, 2023 (ECF 19 No. 27) will remain in effect. 20 DATED THIS 28th day of September 2023. 21 22 23 24 MIRANDA M. DU CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?