Fenton v. Baca et al
Filing
34
ORDER - It is therefore ordered that the Motion (ECF No. 30 ) is granted. Fenton has until and including November 30, 2023, to file a second-amended petition. In all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the order entered August 3, 2023 (ECF No. 27 ) will remain in effect. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/28/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)
Case 3:16-cv-00749-MMD-CLB Document 34 Filed 09/28/23 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
***
6
JOHN MARK FENTON,
Petitioner,
7
8
9
Case No. 3:16-cv-00749-MMD-CLB
ORDER
v.
ISIDRO BACA, et al.,
Respondents.
10
11
The Court previously appointed counsel for Petitioner John Mark Fenton in this
12
habeas corpus action. (ECF No. 12.) Counsel made an initial appearance for Fenton and
13
moved for a stay. (ECF Nos. 13, 20.) On April 9, 2018, the Court granted the motion for
14
stay. (ECF No. 21.) On August 3, 2023, this Court reopened this matter and gave Fenton
15
60 days to file his first-amended petition. (ECF No. 27.) On September 12, 2023, Fenton
16
timely filed his first-amended petition and moved for leave to file a second-amended
17
petition. (ECF Nos. 28, 30 (“Motion”).) Respondents opposed the Motion, and Fenton
18
replied. (ECF Nos. 32, 33.)
19
In his Motion, Fenton states that he filed his first-amended petition as a protective
20
petition to ensure that all the claims would be preserved as timely filed. (ECF No. 30 at
21
2.) Fenton requests leave to file a second-amended petition so that he has a reasonable
22
opportunity to prepare an amended petition that fully reflects counsel’s considered
23
judgment. (Id. at 3.) Fenton further requests that the Court waive the requirement of LR
24
15-1(a), which generally requires a party to attach the proposed amended pleading to a
25
motion seeking leave of court to amend, explaining that the rule is ill-suited for this
26
situation. (Id. at 4.)
27
28
1
Case 3:16-cv-00749-MMD-CLB Document 34 Filed 09/28/23 Page 2 of 2
1
Local Rule 15-1(a) states that a proposed amended pleading must be submitted
2
with the motion for leave to amend unless otherwise permitted by the court. When the
3
court appoints counsel to represent habeas corpus petitioners, as a matter of course it
4
gives counsel leave to file an amended petition. The only difference here is that counsel
5
is trying to file a petition before the one-year deadline to minimize the probability that
6
grounds for relief would not relate back to a timely petition. The Court sees no reason to
7
depart from its usual practice in habeas corpus cases of allowing amended petitions
8
under these circumstances. Moreover, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), a
9
party may amend a pleading with the Court’s leave, and “[t]he court should freely give
10
leave when justice so requires.”
11
The Court finds that there is good cause for Fenton to file a second-amended
12
habeas petition, so the Court grants the Motion and waives the requirement of LR 15-
13
1(a). This order does not, however, affect, in any manner, the operation of the statute of
14
limitations in this case, and the Court does not mean in this order to convey any opinion
15
whatsoever about when the limitations period expires (or expired).
16
It is therefore ordered that the Motion (ECF No. 30) is granted. Fenton has until
17
and including November 30, 2023, to file a second-amended petition. In all other respects,
18
the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the order entered August 3, 2023 (ECF
19
No. 27) will remain in effect.
20
DATED THIS 28th day of September 2023.
21
22
23
24
MIRANDA M. DU
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?