FLS Transportation Services (USA) Inc. v. Casillas et al

Filing 17

ORDER granting ECF No. 16 Stipulation : Response to ECF No. 11 MOTION to Dismiss due by 3/17/2017. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/9/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
Case 3:17-cv-00013-MMD-VPC Document 16 Filed 03/08/17 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 BRIAN W. BOSCHEE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7612 bboschee@nevadafirm.com JAMES W. PUZEY, ESQ . Nevada Bar No. 5745 jpuzey@nevadafirm.com HOLLEY, DRIGGS, WALCH, PUZEY & THOMPSON 800 South Meadows Parkway, Suite 800 Reno, Nevada 89521 Telephone: 775/851-8700 ROBERT W. TORMOHLEN, ESQ. Pro Hac Vice rwtormohlen@lewisricekc.com JOSEPH E. BANT, ESQ. Pro Hac Vice jebant@lewisricekc.com LEWIS RICE LLC 1010 Walnut, Suite 500 Kansas City, Missouri 64106 Telephone: 816/421-2500 12 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff FLS Transportation Services (USA) Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 14 15 FLS TRANSPORTATION SERVICES (USA) INC., a Delaware foreign corporation, CASE NO.: 3:17-CV-00013-MMD-VPC 16 Plaintiff, 17 v. 18 19 ARLIEN CASILLAS, an individual, and OPEN ROAD TRANSPORATION, INC., an Oregon foreign corporation, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF FLS TRANSPORTATION SERVICES (USA) INC. TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT ARLIEN CASILLAS’S MOTION TO DISMISS [FIRST REQUEST] 20 Defendants. 21 Plaintiff FLS Transportation Services (USA) Inc. (“FLS”), Defendant Arlien Casillas 22 (“Casillas”), and Defendant OpenRoad Transportation, Inc. (“OpenRoad”), by and through their 23 undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to an extension of time, up to and including March 17, 24 25 26 - 1 - Case 3:17-cv-00013-MMD-VPC Document 16 Filed 03/08/17 Page 2 of 3 1 2017, for FLS to file a response to Casillas’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 11), which was filed 2 February 24, 2017. The requested extension is to allow FLS additional time to properly research 3 and respond to the issues raised in Casillas’s motion, additional time that is necessary in part due 4 to scheduling conflicts in other cases involving FLS’s counsel. This is the first request for an 5 extension of time for FLS to respond to Casillas’s motion. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 This Stipulation for extension of time for FLS to respond to Casillas’s motion to dismiss is not brought for the purpose of delay or for any other improper purpose. DATED this 8th day of March, 2017. /s/ James W. Puzey_______________ Brian W. Boschee Nevada Bar No. 7612 bboschee@nevadafirm.com James W. Puzey Nevada Bar No. 5745 jpuzey@nevadafirm.com HOLLEY, DRIGGS, WALCH, PUZEY & THOMPSON 800 South Meadows Parkway, Suite 800 Reno, Nevada 89521 /s/ Anthony L. Hall______________ Anthony L. Hall Nevada Bar No. 5977 ahall@hollandhart.com Ricardo N. Cordova Nevada Bar No. 11942 rncordova@hollandhart.com HOLLAND & HART LLP 5441 Kietzke Lane, Second Floor Reno, Nevada 89511 Attorneys for Defendant Arlien Casillas Robert W. Tormohlen (Pro Hac Vice) rwtormohlen@lewisricekc.com Joseph E. Bant (Pro Hac Vice) jebant@lewisricekc.com LEWIS RICE LLC 1010 Walnut, Suite 500 Kansas City, Missouri 64106 Telephone: 816/421-2500 Attorneys for Plaintiff FLS Transportation Services (USA) Inc. /s/ Molly M. Rezac________________ Molly M. Rezac Nevada Bar No. 7435 molly.rezac@ogletree.com Amy A. McGeever Nevada Bar No. 13535 amy.mcgeever@ogletree.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 543 Plumas Street Reno, Nevada 89509 Telephone: 775/440-2372 Attorneys for Defendant OpenRoad Transportation, Inc. 21 22 23 24 25 26 - 2 - Case 3:17-cv-00013-MMD-VPC Document 16 Filed 03/08/17 Page 3 of 3 1 ORDER 2 IT IS SO ORDERED: Response to Defendant's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 11) is due 3/17/2017. 3 ___________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 4 March 9, 2017 DATED:____________________________ 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 - 3 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?