FLS Transportation Services (USA) Inc. v. Casillas et al
Filing
17
ORDER granting ECF No. 16 Stipulation : Response to ECF No. 11 MOTION to Dismiss due by 3/17/2017. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/9/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
Case 3:17-cv-00013-MMD-VPC Document 16 Filed 03/08/17 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
BRIAN W. BOSCHEE, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 7612
bboschee@nevadafirm.com
JAMES W. PUZEY, ESQ
.
Nevada Bar No. 5745
jpuzey@nevadafirm.com
HOLLEY, DRIGGS, WALCH,
PUZEY & THOMPSON
800 South Meadows Parkway, Suite 800
Reno, Nevada 89521
Telephone: 775/851-8700
ROBERT W. TORMOHLEN, ESQ.
Pro Hac Vice
rwtormohlen@lewisricekc.com
JOSEPH E. BANT, ESQ.
Pro Hac Vice
jebant@lewisricekc.com
LEWIS RICE LLC
1010 Walnut, Suite 500
Kansas City, Missouri 64106
Telephone: 816/421-2500
12
13
Attorneys for Plaintiff FLS Transportation Services (USA) Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
14
15
FLS TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
(USA) INC., a Delaware foreign
corporation,
CASE NO.: 3:17-CV-00013-MMD-VPC
16
Plaintiff,
17
v.
18
19
ARLIEN CASILLAS, an individual, and
OPEN ROAD TRANSPORATION, INC.,
an Oregon foreign corporation,
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF
FLS TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
(USA) INC. TO FILE RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANT ARLIEN CASILLAS’S
MOTION TO DISMISS
[FIRST REQUEST]
20
Defendants.
21
Plaintiff FLS Transportation Services (USA) Inc. (“FLS”), Defendant Arlien Casillas
22
(“Casillas”), and Defendant OpenRoad Transportation, Inc. (“OpenRoad”), by and through their
23
undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to an extension of time, up to and including March 17,
24
25
26
- 1 -
Case 3:17-cv-00013-MMD-VPC Document 16 Filed 03/08/17 Page 2 of 3
1
2017, for FLS to file a response to Casillas’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 11), which was filed
2
February 24, 2017. The requested extension is to allow FLS additional time to properly research
3
and respond to the issues raised in Casillas’s motion, additional time that is necessary in part due
4
to scheduling conflicts in other cases involving FLS’s counsel. This is the first request for an
5
extension of time for FLS to respond to Casillas’s motion.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
This Stipulation for extension of time for FLS to respond to Casillas’s motion to dismiss
is not brought for the purpose of delay or for any other improper purpose.
DATED this 8th day of March, 2017.
/s/ James W. Puzey_______________
Brian W. Boschee
Nevada Bar No. 7612
bboschee@nevadafirm.com
James W. Puzey
Nevada Bar No. 5745
jpuzey@nevadafirm.com
HOLLEY, DRIGGS, WALCH,
PUZEY & THOMPSON
800 South Meadows Parkway, Suite 800
Reno, Nevada 89521
/s/ Anthony L. Hall______________
Anthony L. Hall
Nevada Bar No. 5977
ahall@hollandhart.com
Ricardo N. Cordova
Nevada Bar No. 11942
rncordova@hollandhart.com
HOLLAND & HART LLP
5441 Kietzke Lane, Second Floor
Reno, Nevada 89511
Attorneys for Defendant Arlien Casillas
Robert W. Tormohlen
(Pro Hac Vice)
rwtormohlen@lewisricekc.com
Joseph E. Bant
(Pro Hac Vice)
jebant@lewisricekc.com
LEWIS RICE LLC
1010 Walnut, Suite 500
Kansas City, Missouri 64106
Telephone: 816/421-2500
Attorneys for Plaintiff FLS Transportation
Services (USA) Inc.
/s/ Molly M. Rezac________________
Molly M. Rezac
Nevada Bar No. 7435
molly.rezac@ogletree.com
Amy A. McGeever
Nevada Bar No. 13535
amy.mcgeever@ogletree.com
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK
& STEWART, P.C.
543 Plumas Street
Reno, Nevada 89509
Telephone: 775/440-2372
Attorneys for Defendant OpenRoad
Transportation, Inc.
21
22
23
24
25
26
- 2 -
Case 3:17-cv-00013-MMD-VPC Document 16 Filed 03/08/17 Page 3 of 3
1
ORDER
2
IT IS SO ORDERED: Response to Defendant's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 11) is due 3/17/2017.
3
___________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
4
March 9, 2017
DATED:____________________________
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
- 3 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?