Tipton v. Guice et al
Filing
78
ORDER - Magistrate Judge Baldwin's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 74 ) is ADOPTED and ACCEPTED. Defendant Guice's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 53 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 7/9/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT CCOURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
10
DUANE TIPTON,
Plaintiff,
11
12
vs.
13
GUICE, et al,
Defendants.
14
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 3:17-CV-00032-RCJ-CLB
ORDER ADOPTING AND ACCEPTING
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
(ECF NO. 74)
16
17
18
19
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
Carla Baldwin (ECF No. 74 1) entered on April 29, 2020, recommending that the Court deny
Defendant Guice’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 53, 55). On May 13, 2020,
20
Defendant filed his Objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No.
21
22
23
24
25
76) and Plaintiff filed a Response to Defendants Objection (ECF No. 77) on May 18, 2020.
This action was referred to Magistrate Judge Baldwin under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)
and Local Rule IB 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District
of Nevada.
26
27
28
1
Refers to Court’s docket number.
1
1
2
The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the
pleadings and memoranda of the parties including the parties’ objections to the Report and
3
Recommendation and other relevant matters to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2.
4
5
6
7
8
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that United States Magistrate Judge Baldwin’s Report and
Recommendation (ECF No. 74), is ADOPTED and ACCEPTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Guice’s Motion for Summary Judgment
(ECF No. 53) is DENIED.
9
10
11
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 9th day of July, 2020.
______________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?