Holt v. 99 Cent Store of Reno, NV et al

Filing 14

ORDER denying ECF Nos. 12 Motion for Hearing, 13 Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order and 11 Plaintiff's Objection (construed as a motion for reconsideration). Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/5/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 *** 9 MICHAEL L. HOLT, 10 11 12 Case No. 3:17-cv-00051-MMD-VPC Plaintiff, ORDER v. 99 CENT STORE OF RENO, NV, et al., Defendants. 13 14 15 The Court adopted the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and 16 dismissed the second amended complaint with prejudice, without leave to amend. (ECF 17 No. 9.) In response, Plaintiff filed an objection (ECF No. 11), a motion for hearing (ECF 18 No. 12) and a motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 13.) 19 A motion to reconsider must set forth “some valid reason why the court should 20 reconsider its prior decision” and set “forth facts or law of a strongly convincing nature to 21 persuade the court to reverse its prior decision.” Frasure v. United States, 256 F.Supp.2d 22 1180, 1183 (D. Nev. 2003). Reconsideration is appropriate if this Court “(1) is presented 23 with newly discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was 24 manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling law.” Sch. Dist. No. 25 1J v. Acands, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir. 1993). 26 Plaintiff asks for a hearing, but he offers no valid reason for the Court to reconsider 27 its decision to dismiss his seconded amended complaint. Accordingly, the Court will deny 28 reconsideration. 1 It is therefore ordered that Plaintiff’s motion for hearing (ECF No. 12) and motion 2 for reconsideration (ECF No. 13) are denied. Plaintiff’s objection (ECF No. 11) is construed 3 as a motion for reconsideration and is also denied. 4 DATED THIS 5th day of January 2018. 5 6 7 MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?