Corzine v. Laxalt et al

Filing 54

ORDER re ECF No. 53 USCA REFERRAL NOTICE : This Court certifies that Plaintiff's appeal from its order denying in part his motion for preliminary injunction is not frivolous and his in forma pauperis should continue on appeal. USCA case 17-16605. ( E-mail notice (NEF) sent to the US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. ) Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/14/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8

***

9

MATTHEW CORZINE,

10

Case No. 3:17-cv-00052-MMD-WGC
Plaintiff,

ORDER

v.
11
12

ADAM LAZALT; JAMES WRIGHT;
NATALIE WOOD; PATRICK CONMAY;
and K. LOMPREY,

13
Defendants.
14
15
16

This matter is referred to the Court for the limited purpose of determining whether

17

in forma pauperis status should continue on appeal. (ECF No. 53.) This Court certifies

18

that Plaintiff’s appeal from its order denying in part his motion for preliminary injunction is

19

not frivolous and his in forma pauperis should continue on appeal.

20

DATED THIS 14th day of August 2017.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE