Dominquez v. Baker et al

Filing 33

ORDER that respondents' motion for extension of time to file an answer to the petition (ECF No. 27 ) is GRANTED nunc pro tunc; petitioners two unopposed motions for extension of time to file a reply in support of the petition (ECF Nos. 29 , 30 ) are both GRANTED nunc pro tunc. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 6/6/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8

***

9

DAVID SANCHEZ DOMINGUEZ,

10

Case No. 3:17-cv-00053-HDM-WGC

Petitioner,

ORDER

v.
11
RENEE BAKER, et al.,
12
Respondents.
13
14
15
16
17
18

David Sanchez Dominguez’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas
corpus is before the court on motions by both parties. Good cause appearing,
IT IS ORDERED that respondents’ motion for extension of time to file an answer
to the petition (ECF No. 27) is GRANTED nunc pro tunc.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s two unopposed motions for

19

extension of time to file a reply in support of the petition (ECF Nos. 29, 30) are both

20

GRANTED nunc pro tunc.

21

DATED: June 6, 2019.

22
23

HOWARD D. MCKIBBEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

24
25
26
27
28
1