Savoy v. Savoy et al
Filing
18
ORDER granting ECF No. 17 Stipulation : The Reno Justice court case will be withdrawn, and the evidentiary hearing scheduled for Thursday, February 9, 2017, will be cancelled. (See pdf order for additional specifics.) Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/8/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
RICHARD G. HILL, ESQ.
State Bar No. 596
SOPHIE A. KARADANIS, ESQ.
State Bar No. 12006
RICHARD G. HILL, LTD.
652 Forest Street
Reno, Nevada 89509
(775) 348-0888
Attorney for Defendants
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
CHRISTOPHER SEAN SAVOY, individually
)
and derivatively on behalf of INTERNATIONAL )
COMMUNITY OF CHRIST, CHURCH OF THE )
SECOND ADVENT, a Nevada Non-Profit
1
Corporation;
1
) Case No.: 3:17-cv-ooo58-MMD-VPC
Plaintiff,
v.
DOUGLAS EUGENE SAVOY, JR., a n individual;
THE HEAD OVERSEER (BISHOP) OF THE
INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY OF CHRIST,
CHURCH OF THE SECOND ADVENT, AND
HIS SUCCESSORS, A CORPORATION SOLE,
a Nevada Corporation Sole; INTERNATIONAL
COMMUNITY OF CHRIST, CHURCH OF THE
SECOND ADVENT, a Nevada Non-Profit
Corporation and Nominal Defendant, and
DOES I-V, inclusive,
Defendants.
1
1
1
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1
1
j
STIPULATION AND ORDER
The plaintiff and defendants stipulate and agree as follows:
LAW OFFICE
RlCHARD G. HILL
652 Forest Street
Reno, Nevada 89509
(775) 348-0888
Fax(775) 3480858
RECITALS:
Defendants have commenced an eviction action in Reno Justice Court based on
their contention that plaintiff had a tenancy at will and it has been terminated. Reno
Justice Court has now scheduled a hearing on defendants' unlawful detainer claims for
Thursday, February 9,2017, at 8:15 a.m.
Plaintiff has an application for a temporary restraining order and preliminary
injunction pending, but it is not, at this time, clear whether that will be decided by this
Court or the state courts.
Plaintiff and defendants do not want to incur unnecessary fees, and do not want
to cause unnecessary work for this Court, the state district court, or Reno Justice Court.
The parties therefore stipulate and agree as follows:
1.
The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are adopted and ratified by
2.
The Reno Justice court case will be withdrawn, and the evidentiary hearing
the parties.
scheduled for Thursday, February 9,2017, will be cancelled.
3. Plaintiff agrees that if either this Court or the state district court, on remand,
deny his temporary restraining order and motion for preliminary injunction, he will, within
three (3) calendar days, vacate the premises at 2015 LaFond, and defendants may, at that
point, change the locks and take possession. Defendants will not cancel or interrupt
26
LAW OFFICE
RICHARD G. HILL
652 Forest Street
Reno, Nevada 89509
(775) 348-0888
Fax(775) 348-0858
Plaintiff sutilities (phone/power/cable/water, until Plaintiff hasvacatedthe premises.
etc)
27
28
4. If plaintiffs temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction are
2
granted, the parties will comply therewith.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMIlTED this 8th day of February, 2017.
ROBISON, BELAUSTEGUI, SHARP & LOW
~ e n o~ e v g d a
,
89503
Attorney for Plaintiff
Christopher Sean Savoy
RICHARD G. HILL, LTD.
MICHAEL C. LEHNERS, ESQ.
State Bar No. 3331
429 March Avenue
Reno, Nevada 89509
Attorney for The International
Community of Christ, Church
of the Second Advent, a
Nevada non-profit corporation
* i i t i 7 6V&~
~
CHARD G. HILL, ESO.
State Bar No. 596
SOPHIE A. KARADANIS, ESQ.
State Bar No. 12006
652 Forest Street
Reno, Nevada 89509
Attorneys for Douglas Eugene Savoy, Jr.,
individually, and as Head Overseer (Bishop)
of the International Communitv of Christ.
Church of the Second Advent; i n d the
and International Community of Christ
Church of the Second Advent, and his
Successors, a Corporation Sole, a Nevada
Corporation Sole
s
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 8th day o f February, 2017.
UNITED STATES
LAW OFFICE
RICHARD G. HILL
652 Forest Street
Reno, Nevada 89509
(775) 3480888
Fax(775) 348-0858
DISTRICT JUDGE
--
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?