Miller v. Aranas et al

Filing 81

ORDER Scheduling a Settlement Conference for 10/15/2020 at 9:00 AM in Reno Courtroom TBD before Magistrate Judge Robert A. McQuaid, Jr. The settlement conference statements shall be received in the Clerk's Office - Suite 301 not later than 4:00 PM on 10/8/2020. DO NOT SERVE A COPY ON OPPOSING COUNSEL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert A. McQuaid, Jr on 8/24/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW)

Download PDF
Case 3:17-cv-00068-MMD-WGC Document 81 Filed 08/24/20 Page 1 of 4 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 2 3 4 CLIFFORD W. MILLER, 5 Plaintiff, 6 7 vs. 8 ROMEO ARANAS, et al., 9 Defendant. 10 11 12 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00068-MMD-WGC ORDER SCHEDULING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Pursuant to the parties’ notice to proceed with settlement conference (ECF No. 80), a settlement conference is hereby scheduled to commence on THURSDAY, OCTOBER 15, 2020 13 at 9:00 A.M., in Reno Courtroom to be determined, Bruce R. Thompson U.S. Courthouse and 14 15 Federal Building, 400 South Virginia Street, Reno, Nevada, before U.S. Magistrate Judge Robert 16 A. McQuaid, Jr. 17 18 Unless excused by order of the court, clients or client representatives with complete authority to negotiate and consummate a settlement shall be in attendance at the settlement 19 conference. This requires the presence of the client or if a corporate, governmental, or other 20 21 22 23 24 organizational entity, an authorized representative of the client. For a defendant, such representative must have final settlement authority to commit the organization to pay, in the representative’s own discretion, a settlement amount up to the plaintiff’s prayer, or up to the plaintiff’s last demand, whichever is lower. For a plaintiff, such 25 representative must have final authority, in the representative’s own discretion, to authorize 26 27 dismissal of the case with prejudice, or to accept a settlement amount down to the defendant’s 28 ORDER SCHEDULING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE - 1 Case 3:17-cv-00068-MMD-WGC Document 81 Filed 08/24/20 Page 2 of 4 1 2 last offer. If board approval is required to authorize settlement, the attendance of at least one sitting member of the board (preferably the chairperson) is absolutely required. 3 Any insurance company that is a party or may be contractually required to defend or to 4 5 pay damages, if any, assessed within its policy limits in this case must have a fully authorized 6 settlement representative present. Such representative must have final settlement authority to 7 commit the company to pay, in the representative’s own discretion, an amount within the 8 policy limits, or up to the plaintiff’s last demand, whichever is lower. 9 The purpose of the requirement of personal attendance is to have a representative 10 11 present who has both the authority to exercise his or her own discretion, and the realistic 12 freedom to exercise such discretion without the negative consequences, in order to settle the 13 case during the settlement conference without consulting someone else who is not present. 14 In the event counsel for any party is aware of any circumstance which might cast doubt on a 15 client’s compliance with this paragraph, he/she shall immediately discuss the circumstance with 16 17 18 opposing counsel to resolve it well before the settlement conference, and, if such discussion does not resolve it, request a telephone conference with the court and counsel. 19 20 Counsel appearing for the settlement conference without their client representatives or insurance company representatives, unless authorized as described above, may cause the 21 settlement conference to be canceled or rescheduled. If this occurs, the non-complying party, 22 23 attorney or insurer may be assessed the costs and expenses, including attorney fees, incurred by 24 other parties and the court as a result of such cancellation, as well as any additional sanctions 25 deemed appropriate by the court. Counsel are responsible for timely advising any involved non- 26 party insurance company of the requirements of this order. 27 /// 28 ORDER SCHEDULING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE - 2 Case 3:17-cv-00068-MMD-WGC Document 81 Filed 08/24/20 Page 3 of 4 1 I. 2 PREPARATION FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Obviously, the conference is intended to facilitate settlement of this case. It will be 3 conducted in such a manner as not to prejudice any party in the event settlement is not reached. 4 5 To that end, all matters communicated to the undersigned in confidence will be kept confidential, 6 and will not be disclosed to any other party, or to the trial judge. The undersigned, of course, 7 will not serve as the trial judge in this case. 8 At the settlement conference the parties, by counsel, may be requested to present a brief 9 (5-10 minute) non-confrontational presentation outlining the factual and legal highlights of their 10 11 case. [If the parties believe the initial joint session will be counterproductive, please state so in 12 your respective settlement briefs along with your rationale for same.] Thereafter, separate, 13 confidential caucuses will be held with each party and/or the party’s representative(s). 14 I. PREPARATION FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 15 In preparation for the settlement conference, the attorneys for each party shall submit a 16 17 18 confidential settlement conference statement for the court's in camera review. The settlement conference statement shall contain the following: 19 1. A brief statement of the nature of the action. 20 2. A concise summary of the evidence that supports your theory of the case, including 21 information which documents your damages claims. You may attach to your statement 22 those documents or exhibits which are especially relevant to key factual or legal issues, 23 including selected pages from deposition transcripts or responses to other discovery requests. 24 3. An analysis of the key issues involved in the litigation. 25 26 27 4. A discussion of the strongest points in your case, both legal and factual, and a frank discussion of the weakest points as well. The court expects you to present a candid evaluation of the merits of your case. 28 ORDER SCHEDULING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE - 3 Case 3:17-cv-00068-MMD-WGC Document 81 Filed 08/24/20 Page 4 of 4 1 5. A further discussion of the strongest and weakest points in your opponents’ case, but only 2 inf they are more than simply the converse of the weakest and strongest points in your 3 case. 4 5 6. An estimate of the cost (including attorney fees and costs) of taking this case through trial. 7. A history of settlement discussions, if any, which details the demands and offers which 6 have been made, and the reasons they have been rejected. 7 8 9 10 11 8. The settlement proposal that you believe would be fair. 9. The settlement proposal that you would honestly be willing to make in order to conclude this matter and stop the expense of litigation. The settlement conference statements shall be received in the Clerk’s Office, 400 S. Virginia Street, Room 301, not later than THRUSDAY, OCTOBER 8, 2020, by 4:00 P.M. 12 DO NOT SERVE A COPY ON OPPOSING COUNSEL. 13 14 15 16 17 The settlement conference statement should be delivered to the Clerk’s Office in an envelope clearly marked “Confidential Contains Settlement Brief.” The purpose of the settlement conference statement is to assist the court in preparing for and conducting the settlement conference. In order to facilitate a meaningful conference, your 18 utmost candor in responding to all of the above listed questions is required. The settlement 19 20 conference statements will not be seen by the trial judge. The confidentiality of each statement 21 will be strictly maintained in my chambers. Following the conference, the settlement conference 22 statements will be destroyed. 23 Dated this 24th day of August, 2020. 24 25 U.S. Magistrate Judge, Robert A. McQuaid, Jr. 26 27 28 ORDER SCHEDULING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE - 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?