Randolph v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al

Filing 39

ORDERED that plaintiff's response to defendants' answer to plaintiff's complaint (ECF No. 38 ) is hereby STRICKEN. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin Carry on 4/26/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA LOUIS RANDOLPH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF ) CORRECTIONS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ________________________________ ) 3:17-CV-0085-MMD-CBC MINUTES OF THE COURT April 26, 2019 PRESENT: THE HONORABLE CARLA BALDWIN CARRY, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: LISA MANN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS: Plaintiff filed a response to defendants= answer to plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 38). FRCP 7(a) does not allow additional pleadings to be filed absent a court order. There is no court order allowing the plaintiff to file such a response to defendants= answer. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff=s response to defendants’ answer to plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 38) is hereby STRICKEN. IT IS SO ORDERED. DEBRA K. KEMPI, CLERK By: /s/ Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?