Randolph v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
Filing
39
ORDERED that plaintiff's response to defendants' answer to plaintiff's complaint (ECF No. 38 ) is hereby STRICKEN. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin Carry on 4/26/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
LOUIS RANDOLPH,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF
)
CORRECTIONS, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
________________________________ )
3:17-CV-0085-MMD-CBC
MINUTES OF THE COURT
April 26, 2019
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE CARLA BALDWIN CARRY, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEPUTY CLERK:
LISA MANN
REPORTER: NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Plaintiff filed a response to defendants= answer to plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 38).
FRCP 7(a) does not allow additional pleadings to be filed absent a court order. There is
no court order allowing the plaintiff to file such a response to defendants= answer.
Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff=s response to defendants’ answer to
plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 38) is hereby STRICKEN.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DEBRA K. KEMPI, CLERK
By:
/s/
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?