Stewart v. Aranas, et al.

Filing 77

ORDER granting ECF No. 76 Stipulation. Plaintiff's Reply to Defendants' Opposition (ECF No. 75 ) re the Motion to Vacate (ECF No. 71 ) is due by August 5, 2020. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/21/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)

Case 3:17-cv-00132-MMD-CLB Document 77 Filed 07/21/20 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4

LAGOMARSINO LAW
ANDRE M. LAGOMARSINO, ESQ.
3005 W. Horizon Ridge Pkwy., Suite 241
Henderson, Nevada 89052
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff

5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA
LEWIS STEWART, an individual,

Case No.: 3:17-cv-00132-MMD-CLB

8
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.

11
12
13
14

Telephone [phone]

ROMEO
ARANAS;
JAMES
COX;
FRANCISCO M. SANCHES; BRIAN E.
WILLIAMS,
Defendants – Appellants,
and

(First Request)

15
16
17

CHERYL BURSON; S.L. CLARK; JAMES E.
DZURENDA; ANGIE JONES; SEAN SU;
STATE OF NEVADA
Defendants.

18
19

WHEREAS Defendants Romeo Aranas, James Cox, Francisco Sanchez and Brian Williams
20
21
22

collectively filed their opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Vacate the Stay Pending Defendants’
28

Facsimile [phone]

10

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF’S
DEADLINE TO FILE HIS REPLY TO
DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO VACATE
THE STAY PENDING DEFENDANTS’
APPEAL AND REQUEST TO CERTIFY
DEFENDANTS’ APPEAL AS
FRIVOLOUS (ECF NO. 75)

Appeal and Request to Certify Defendants’ Appeal as Frivolous on July 15, 2020 (ECF No. 75).

23

Pursuant to Local Rule IA 6-1(a), the parties hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for

24

plaintiff to file his reply to defendants’ opposition. The current deadline for plaintiff to reply to

25

defendants’ opposition is July 22, 2020. The new deadline for plaintiff to reply to defendants’

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

LAGOMARSINO LAW

3005 W. Horizon Ridge Pkwy., #241, Henderson, Nevada 89052

9

26

opposition will be August 5, 2020.

27
28

///

Page 1 of 2

Case 3:17-cv-00132-MMD-CLB Document 77 Filed 07/21/20 Page 2 of 2

Good cause exists because one (1) of plaintiff’s associate attorneys has suddenly been

1
2

quarantined due to a possible exposure to COVID-19. As a firm of only three (3) attorneys, the

3

attorney that was tasked with drafting the reply brief has had to cover the caseload for the

4

quarantined attorney resulting in a delay to draft reply. This unexpected coverage includes coverage

5

for multiple depositions and deposition preparation during the seven (7) day period that would have

6

been otherwise allocated for the drafting of a reply brief.

7
This extension is the first request for an extension and is not submitted for the purpose of
8

11

DATED this 20th day of July, 2020.

DATED this 20th day of July, 2020.

12

LAGOMARSINO LAW

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

13
14

Telephone [phone]

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

15
16

/s/ Andre M. Lagomarsino
Andre M. Lagomarsino, Esq. (#6711)
3005 W. Horizon Ridge Pkwy., #241
Henderson, Nevada 89052
Attorney for Plaintiff Lewis Stewart

.

_/S/ FRANK TODDRE II ___________________.
Frank Toddre II, Esq.
555 East Washington Avenue, Suite 3900
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Attorney for Defendants Romeo Aranas, James
Cox, Francisco Sanchez and Brian Williams

17
18
19
20
21

IT IS SO ORDERED.
___________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
July 21, 2020
DATED: ______________________________

28

Facsimile [phone]

10

delay.

22
23
24

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

LAGOMARSINO LAW

3005 W. Horizon Ridge Pkwy., #241, Henderson, Nevada 89052

9

25
26
27
28
Page 2 of 2